266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11798743)
1. [Assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex scanning magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography: a comparative study].
Guo D; Wang Y; Fu W
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 80(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11798743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Role of 0.5 T magnetic resonance and duplex ultrasonography in the imaging of stenotic and oblitertive changes in the carotid arteries].
Hebrang A; Brinar V; Vidjak V; Grga A; Sarlija M; Sosa T; Tomac S; Drasković J
Lijec Vjesn; 2002 May; 124(5):129-33. PubMed ID: 12152411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound examination with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease.
Liberopoulos K; Kaponis A; Kokkinis K; Pagratis N; Nicolakopoulou Z; Douskou M; Stringaris K; Clonaris C; Balas P
Int Angiol; 1996 Jun; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8803637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review.
Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.
Cassola N; Baptista-Silva JC; Nakano LC; Flumignan CD; Sesso R; Vasconcelos V; Carvas Junior N; Flumignan RL
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Jul; 7(7):CD013172. PubMed ID: 35815652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of 2D-MR angiography, duplex scanning, and arteriography.
Spartera C; Morettini G; Marino G; Marsili L; Di Cesare E; La Barbera G; Petrassi C; Ventura M
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1993 Jun; 34(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 8344970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE
Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
White JE; Russell WL; Greer MS; Whittle MT
Am Surg; 1994 May; 60(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 8161084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of subjective visual impression for evaluation with digital subtraction angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
U-King-Im JM; Graves MJ; Cross JJ; Higgins NJ; Wat J; Trivedi RA; Tang T; Howarth SP; Kirkpatrick PJ; Antoun NM; Gillard JH
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):213-22. PubMed ID: 17507721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
Wölfle KD; Schnur C; Pfadenhauer K; Bruijnen H; Bohndorf K; Loeprecht H
Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens.
Netuka D; Ostrý S; Belsán T; Rucka D; Mandys V; Charvát F; Bradác O; Benes V
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2010 Jul; 152(7):1215-21. PubMed ID: 20411283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging.
Clevert DA; Johnson T; Michaely H; Jung EM; Flach PM; Strautz TI; Clevert DA; Reiser M; Schoenberg SO
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 16920314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carotid bifurcation stenosis: a comparative study between MR angiography and duplex scanning with respect to digital subtraction angiography.
Carriero A; Ucchino S; Magarelli N; Legnini M; Macrì MA; Napolitano AM; Bonomo L
J Neuroradiol; 1995 Jun; 22(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 7629567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
