These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11799328)

  • 1. Evaluation of arterial bypass grafts of the pelvic and lower extremities with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Dorenbeck U; Seitz J; Völk M; Strotzer M; Lenhart M; Feuerbach S; Link J
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Feb; 37(2):60-4. PubMed ID: 11799328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
    Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast material-enhanced, moving-table MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts.
    Loewe C; Cejna M; Schoder M; Loewe-Grgurin M; Wolf F; Lammer J; Thurnher SA
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Sep; 14(9 Pt 1):1129-37. PubMed ID: 14514804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of peripheral bypass grafts.
    Loewe C; Cejna M; Lammer J; Thurnher SA
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(5):725-32. PubMed ID: 10823623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography.
    Meissner OA; Verrel F; Tató F; Siebert U; Ramirez H; Ruppert V; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts.
    Froger CL; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Douwes-Draaijer P; Cuypers PW; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):284-91. PubMed ID: 15618386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Digital Subtraction Angiography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Calf Compression at 3.0 Tesla.
    Wei LM; Zhu YQ; Zhang PL; Lu HT; Zhao JG
    J Endovasc Ther; 2019 Feb; 26(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 30580695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with three-dimensional MR angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Bertschinger K; Cassina PC; Debatin JF; Ruehm SG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jan; 176(1):215-20. PubMed ID: 11133569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
    Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overestimation of moderate carotid stenosis assessed by both Doppler US and contrast enhanced 3D-MR angiography in the CARMEDAS study.
    Nonent M; Ben Salem D; Serfaty JM; Buthion V; Pasco-Papon A; Rotaru C; Bressollette L; Papon X; Pachai C; Fortrat JO; Gouny P; Badra A; Berge J; Le Bras Y; Cottier JP; Gauvrit JY; Douek P
    J Neuroradiol; 2011 Jul; 38(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 20728218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multi-detector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography.
    Willmann JK; Mayer D; Banyai M; Desbiolles LM; Verdun FR; Seifert B; Marincek B; Weishaupt D
    Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):465-74. PubMed ID: 14595148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities: standard-dose vs. high-dose gadodiamide injection.
    Krause U; Kroencke T; Spielhaupter E; Taupitz M; Kenn W; Hamm B; Hahn D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15778953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pedal artery imaging--a comparison of selective digital subtraction angiography, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound.
    Hofmann WJ; Forstner R; Kofler B; Binder K; Ugurluoglu A; Magometschnigg H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 24(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 12323169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stenosis detection in forearm hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae by multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: preliminary experience.
    Planken RN; Tordoir JH; Dammers R; de Haan MW; Oei TK; van der Sande FM; van Engelshoven JM; Leiner T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jan; 17(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12500274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA.
    Stacul F; Gava S; Belgrano M; Cernic S; Pagnan L; Pozzi Mucelli F; Cova MA
    Radiol Med; 2008 Jun; 113(4):529-46. PubMed ID: 18480971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.
    Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Herber S; Martenstein S; Dorweiler B; Dueber C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 18058929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Huegli RW; Thalhammer C; Jacob AL; Jaeger K; Bilecen D
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 66(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17658713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Hentsch A; Aschauer MA; Balzer JO; Brossmann J; Busch HP; Davis K; Douek P; Ebner F; van Engelshoven JM; Gregor M; Kersting C; Knüsel PR; Leen E; Leiner T; Loewe C; McPherson S; Reimer P; Schäfer FK; Taupitz M; Thurnher SA; Tombach B; Wegener R; Weishaupt D; Meaney JF
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Sep; 13(9):2103-14. PubMed ID: 12928960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
    Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of semiautomated analysis of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for detection and quantification of aortoiliac stenoses.
    de Vries M; de Koning PJ; de Haan MW; Kessels AG; Nelemans PJ; Nijenhuis RJ; Planken RN; Vasbinder GB; van Engelshoven JM; van der Geest RJ; Leiner T
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Aug; 40(8):495-503. PubMed ID: 16024987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.