323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11800216)
1. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
Stinchfield R
Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)].
Kido M; Shimazaki T
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Feb; 77(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 17447464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a Brazilian sample.
de Oliveira MP; da Silveira DX; de Carvalho SV; Collakis ST; Bizeto J; Silva MT
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):557-68. PubMed ID: 19774450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using a Rasch model to examine the utility of the South Oaks Gambling Screen across clinical and community samples.
Strong DR; Lesieur HR; Breen RB; Stinchfield R; Lejuez CW
Addict Behav; 2004 May; 29(3):465-81. PubMed ID: 15050667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the South Oaks Gambling Screen with DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria: results from a diverse community sample of gamblers.
Goodie AS; MacKillop J; Miller JD; Fortune EE; Maples J; Lance CE; Campbell WK
Assessment; 2013 Oct; 20(5):523-31. PubMed ID: 23946283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling.
Stinchfield R
Am J Psychiatry; 2003 Jan; 160(1):180-2. PubMed ID: 12505822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An assessment of the psychometric properties of Lithuanian versions of DSM-IV-MR-J and SOGS-RA.
Skokauskas N; Burba B; Freedman D
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Jun; 25(2):263-71. PubMed ID: 19241149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Presence of problematic and disordered gambling in older age and validation of the South Oaks Gambling Scale.
Granero R; Jiménez-Murcia S; Fernández-Aranda F; Del Pino-Gutiérrez A; Mena-Moreno T; Mestre-Bach G; Gómez-Peña M; Moragas L; Aymamí N; Giroux I; Grall-Bronnec M; Sauvaget A; Codina E; Vintró-Alcaraz C; Lozano-Madrid M; Camozzi M; Agüera Z; Sánchez-González J; Casalé-Salayet G; Sánchez I; López-González H; Valenciano-Mendoza E; Mora B; Baenas I; Menchón JM
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233222. PubMed ID: 32428026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DSM-IV and the South Oaks Gambling Screen: diagnosing and assessing pathological gambling in Turkey.
Duvarci I; Varan A; Coşkunol H; Ersoy MA
J Gambl Stud; 1997; 13(3):193-206. PubMed ID: 12913386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons between the South Oaks Gambling Screen and a DSM-IV-based interview in a community survey of problem gambling.
Cox BJ; Enns MW; Michaud V
Can J Psychiatry; 2004 Apr; 49(4):258-64. PubMed ID: 15147024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of a Spanish translation of a measure of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling.
Jiménez-Murcia S; Stinchfield R; Alvarez-Moya E; Jaurrieta N; Bueno B; Granero R; Aymamí MN; Gómez-Peña M; Martínez-Giménez R; Fernández-Aranda F; Vallejo J
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Mar; 25(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 18592357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability, Validity, and Classification Accuracy of the DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Gambling Disorder and Comparison to DSM-IV.
Stinchfield R; McCready J; Turner NE; Jimenez-Murcia S; Petry NM; Grant J; Welte J; Chapman H; Winters KC
J Gambl Stud; 2016 Sep; 32(3):905-22. PubMed ID: 26408026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using the NORC DSM Screen for Gambling Problems as an outcome measure for pathological gambling: psychometric evaluation.
Hodgins DC
Addict Behav; 2004 Nov; 29(8):1685-90. PubMed ID: 15451138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A critical review of adolescent problem gambling assessment instruments.
Stinchfield R
Int J Adolesc Med Health; 2010; 22(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 20491419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The performance of two pathological gambling screens in college students.
Weinstock J; Whelan JP; Meyers AW; McCausland C
Assessment; 2007 Dec; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 17986657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Reliability Generalization Meta-analysis of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
Esparza-Reig J; Guillén-Riquelme A; Martí-Vilar M; González-Sala F
Psicothema; 2021 Aug; 33(3):490-499. PubMed ID: 34297680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Concordance between the SOGS-RA and the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling among youth.
Ladouceur R; Ferland F; Poulin C; Vitaro F; Wiebe J
Psychol Addict Behav; 2005 Sep; 19(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 16187805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling: reliability, validity, and classification accuracy.
Stinchfield R; Govoni R; Frisch GR
Am J Addict; 2005; 14(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 15804879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth: why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment.
Hardoon K; Derevensky JL; Gupta R
Addict Behav; 2003 Jul; 28(5):933-46. PubMed ID: 12788266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
