149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11801424)
1. Modeling of post-surgical brain and skull defects in the EEG inverse problem with the boundary element method.
Bénar CG; Gotman J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 113(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 11801424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of skull conductivity perturbations on EEG dipole source analysis.
Chen F; Hallez H; Staelens S
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4475-84. PubMed ID: 20879606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dipole location errors in electroencephalogram source analysis due to volume conductor model errors.
Vanrumste B; Van Hoey G; Van de Walle R; D'Havé M; Lemahieu I; Boon P
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2000 Sep; 38(5):528-34. PubMed ID: 11094809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of local skull inhomogeneities on EEG source estimation.
Ollikainen JO; Vauhkonen M; Karjalainen PA; Kaipio JP
Med Eng Phys; 1999 Apr; 21(3):143-54. PubMed ID: 10468356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of electrode location errors on EEG dipole source localization with a realistic head model.
Wang Y; Gotman J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2001 Sep; 112(9):1777-80. PubMed ID: 11514261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation.
Akalin Acar Z; Acar CE; Makeig S
Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):168-180. PubMed ID: 26302675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incorporating and Compensating Cerebrospinal Fluid in Surface-Based Forward Models of Magneto- and Electroencephalography.
Stenroos M; Nummenmaa A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159595. PubMed ID: 27472278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimum-norm cortical source estimation in layered head models is robust against skull conductivity error.
Stenroos M; Hauk O
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():265-272. PubMed ID: 23639259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom.
Leahy RM; Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Huang MX; Lewine JD
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug; 107(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 9751287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of skull anisotropy for the forward and inverse problem in EEG: simulation studies using FEM on realistic head models.
Marin G; Guerin C; Baillet S; Garnero L; Meunier G
Hum Brain Mapp; 1998; 6(4):250-69. PubMed ID: 9704264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Role of Skull Modeling in EEG Source Imaging for Patients with Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.
Montes-Restrepo V; Carrette E; Strobbe G; Gadeyne S; Vandenberghe S; Boon P; Vonck K; Mierlo Pv
Brain Topogr; 2016 Jul; 29(4):572-89. PubMed ID: 26936594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG measurements to tissue conductivity.
Gençer NG; Acar CE
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):701-17. PubMed ID: 15070197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved dipole localization using local mesh refinement of realistic head geometries: an EEG simulation study.
Yvert B; Bertrand O; Echallier JF; Pernier J
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 99(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 8758973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validating EEG source imaging using intracranial electrical stimulation.
Unnwongse K; Rampp S; Wehner T; Kowoll A; Parpaley Y; von Lehe M; Lanfer B; Rusiniak M; Wolters C; Wellmer J
Brain Commun; 2023; 5(1):fcad023. PubMed ID: 36824389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
