127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11803779)
1. [Comparative study of the degree of patient satisfaction in intermittent catheterization with Lofric and polyvinyl chloride catheters].
López Pereira P; Martínez Urrutia MJ; Lobato L; Rivas S; Jaureguizar Monereo E
Actas Urol Esp; 2001; 25(10):725-30. PubMed ID: 11803779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a new PVC-free catheter material for intermittent catheterization: a prospective, randomized, crossover study.
Johansson K; Greis G; Johansson B; Grundtmann A; Pahlby Y; Törn S; Axelberg H; Carlsson P
Scand J Urol; 2013 Feb; 47(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 22762536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient experience with hydrophilic catheters used in clean intermittent catheterization.
Taskinen S; Fagerholm R; Ruutu M
J Pediatr Urol; 2008 Oct; 4(5):367-71. PubMed ID: 18790422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Patient satisfaction with two different types of bladder catheters].
Litherland AT; Aas MS; Schiøtz HA
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 16415935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using the LoFric catheter.
Sutherland RS; Kogan BA; Baskin LS; Mevorach RA
J Urol; 1996 Dec; 156(6):2041-3. PubMed ID: 8911385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel product for intermittent catheterisation: its impact on compliance with daily life--international multicentre study.
Bjerklund Johansen T; Hultling C; Madersbacher H; Del Popolo G; Amarenco G;
Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):213-20. PubMed ID: 17166653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The LoFric catheter: new technology improves an old technique.
Montagnino B
Urol Nurs; 2000 Aug; 20(4):247-9, 253. PubMed ID: 11998087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization.
Vapnek JM; Maynard FM; Kim J
J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):994-8. PubMed ID: 12576829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient satisfaction and the LoFric catheter for clean intermittent catheterization.
Diokno AC; Mitchell BA; Nash AJ; Kimbrough JA
J Urol; 1995 Feb; 153(2):349-51. PubMed ID: 7815580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the microbiological milieu of patients randomized to either hydrophilic or conventional PVC catheters for clean intermittent catheterization.
Lucas EJ; Baxter C; Singh C; Mohamed AZ; Li B; Zhang J; Jayanthi VR; Koff SA; VanderBrink B; Justice SS
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Jun; 12(3):172.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26951923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parent and child experiences using a hydrophilic or reused PVC catheter for intermittent catheterisation.
Chick HE; Hunter KF; Moore KN
J Clin Nurs; 2013 Feb; 22(3-4):513-20. PubMed ID: 22827882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complications and patient satisfaction with urethral clean intermittent catheterization in spina bifida patients: comparing coated vs uncoated catheters.
Burki T; Abasher A; Alshahrani A; Al Hams AW; Ibrahim H; Albadawe H; Al Modhen F; Jamalalail Y; Al Shammari A
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):646-650. PubMed ID: 31699601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study.
Sarica S; Akkoc Y; Karapolat H; Aktug H
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2010 Dec; 46(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20445490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of a prospective randomized control trial comparing hydrophilic to uncoated catheters in children with neurogenic bladder.
DeFoor W; Reddy P; Reed M; VanderBrink B; Jackson E; Zhang B; Denlinger J; Noh P; Minevich E; Sheldon C
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Aug; 13(4):373.e1-373.e5. PubMed ID: 28713004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study comparing polyvinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride-free catheter materials.
Witjes JA; Del Popolo G; Marberger M; Jonsson O; Kaps HP; Chapple CR
J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2794-8. PubMed ID: 19837425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of prelubricated hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic polyvinyl chloride catheters for urethral catheterization.
Pachler J; Frimodt-Møller C
BJU Int; 1999 May; 83(7):767-9. PubMed ID: 10368193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unusual complications of intermittent self-catheterisation in spinal cord injury patients.
Vaidyanathan S; Krishnan KR; Soni BM; Fraser MH
Spinal Cord; 1996 Dec; 34(12):745-7. PubMed ID: 8961434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-perceived discomfort with two coated urinary catheters.
Litherland AT; Schiøtz HA
Br J Nurs; 2007 Mar 8-21; 16(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 17505374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hydrophilic-coated catheters for intermittent catheterisation reduce urethral micro trauma: a prospective, randomised, participant-blinded, crossover study of three different types of catheters.
Stensballe J; Looms D; Nielsen PN; Tvede M
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):978-83. PubMed ID: 16126331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the use of Urocath-Gel catheters for intermittent self-catheterization by male patients using conventional catheters for a long time.
Wyndaele J; De Ridder D; Everaert K; Heilporn A; Congard-Chassol B
Spinal Cord; 2000 Feb; 38(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 10762182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
