77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11804920)
1. Reduced-dose digital mammography of skin calcifications.
Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Bick U; Hamm B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):473-4. PubMed ID: 11804920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dermal breast calcifications: localization with template-guided placement of skin marker.
Berkowitz JE; Gatewood OM; Donovan GB; Gayler BW
Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):282. PubMed ID: 3823452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of atypical skin calcifications.
Frenna TH; Meyer JE
Radiology; 1993 May; 187(2):584. PubMed ID: 8475315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A useful sign for distinguishing clustered skin calcifications from calcifications within the breast on mammograms.
Sitzman SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jun; 158(6):1407-8. PubMed ID: 1590166
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dermal calcifications in fixed orientation: the tattoo sign.
Homer MJ; D'Orsi CJ; Sitzman SB
Radiology; 1994 Jul; 192(1):161-3. PubMed ID: 8208930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography: image quality and lesion detection.
Fischmann A; Siegmann KC; Wersebe A; Claussen CD; Müller-Schimpfle M
Br J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 78(928):312-5. PubMed ID: 15774591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the comparison of actual and calculated improvements in the imaging of calcifications using magnification mammography.
Muntz EP
Med Phys; 1981; 8(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 7322068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammographic abnormalities of the skin and subcutaneous tissues.
Britton CA
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1994; 35(1):61-83. PubMed ID: 8185835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital luminescence mammography. Early clinical experience.
Jarlman O; Samuelsson L; Braw M
Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 2031792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Invariant moment shape description of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
Coakley K; van Doorn T
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1995 Jun; 18(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 7669022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stereotactic core biopsy of breast microcalcifications: comparison of film versus digital mammography, both using an add-on unit.
Becker L; Taves D; McCurdy L; Muscedere G; Karlik S; Ward S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Dec; 177(6):1451-7. PubMed ID: 11717106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications.
Oestmann JW; Kopans DB; Linetsky L; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; White G; Swann C; Kelley JE; Johnson LL
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):657-9. PubMed ID: 3406394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography.
Kim HH; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Jiroutek MR; Muller KE; Zheng Y; Kuzmiak CM; Koomen MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jul; 187(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 16794154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Improvement of detectability of microcalcifications by magnification digital mammography].
Higashida Y; Hatemura M; Yoshida A; Takada T; Takahashi M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 58(9):473-8. PubMed ID: 9778932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsy of calcifications different for digital and film-screen mammography?
McLaughlin CT; Neal CH; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 25247961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance.
Samei E; Saunders RS; Baker JA; Delong DM
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 17356178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrated wavelets for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
Heinlein P; Drexl J; Schneider W
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Mar; 22(3):402-13. PubMed ID: 12760557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Digital magnification mammography. A new technique for improved visualization of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis].
Reuther G; Hoffmann R; Bier B
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 8516436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analogic versus digital mammographic examination a radiological study of mammary microcalcifications on 52 surgical samples.
Di Nubila B; Cassano E; Origgi D; Treviganti R; Bozzini A; Cernigliaro F; Faissola B; Meneghetti L; Renne G; Balestreri N; Luini A; Bellomi M
Radiol Med; 2003 Oct; 106(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 14612821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Digital mammography with high-resolution storage plates (CR) versus full-field digital mammography (CCD) (DR) for microcalcifications and focal lesions -- a retrospective clinical histologic analysis (n = 102)].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Dassel MS; Bautz W
Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 15657822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
