These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
27. [The stationary grid in mammography: its clinical evaluation]. Draghi F; Ferrozzi G; Ferrozzi F; Ferranti C Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):96-102. PubMed ID: 8480057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography: image contrast and lesion characterization. Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Sato A; Saito M; Saito H; Matsuhashi T; Takahashi S Radiat Med; 2003; 21(4):166-71. PubMed ID: 14514123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [The diagnostic accuracy of a digital mammography system with photostimulable storage phosphors used with automatic reading]. Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; De Gaspari A; Tacchini S; Camalori M; Del Maschio A Radiol Med; 1996; 91(1-2):46-51. PubMed ID: 8614730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets. Wang TC; Karayiannis NB IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Aug; 17(4):498-509. PubMed ID: 9845306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Comparing the visualization of microcalcifications with direct magnification in digital full-field mammography vs. film-screen mammography]. Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Bick U; Rogalla P; Blohmer JU; Winzer KJ; Hamm B Rofo; 2002 Mar; 174(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 11885006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dermal deposits mistaken for breast calcifications. Kopans DB; Meyer JE; Homer MJ; Grabbe J Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):592-4. PubMed ID: 6622710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study. Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Grabbe E Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):478-82. PubMed ID: 12857708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography]. Diekmann S; Bick U; von Heyden H; Diekmann F Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography]. Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital spot mammography using an add-on upright unit: diagnostic application in daily practice. Mesurolle B; Mignon F; Ariche-Cohen M; Kao E; Gagnon JH; Goumot PA Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jul; 51(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 15186886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computer-aided detection of amorphous calcifications. Soo MS; Rosen EL; Xia JQ; Ghate S; Baker JA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):887-92. PubMed ID: 15728613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD). Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: comparison in the patients with microcalcifications. Kim HS; Han BK; Choo KS; Jeon YH; Kim JH; Choe YH Korean J Radiol; 2005; 6(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 16374078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]