152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11805071)
1. Assessing allelic dropout and genotype reliability using maximum likelihood.
Miller CR; Joyce P; Waits LP
Genetics; 2002 Jan; 160(1):357-66. PubMed ID: 11805071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maximum-likelihood estimation of allelic dropout and false allele error rates from microsatellite genotypes in the absence of reference data.
Johnson PC; Haydon DT
Genetics; 2007 Feb; 175(2):827-42. PubMed ID: 17179070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A maximum-likelihood method to correct for allelic dropout in microsatellite data with no replicate genotypes.
Wang C; Schroeder KB; Rosenberg NA
Genetics; 2012 Oct; 192(2):651-69. PubMed ID: 22851645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-step multiplex polymerase chain reaction improves the speed and accuracy of genotyping using DNA from noninvasive and museum samples.
Arandjelovic M; Guschanski K; Schubert G; Harris TR; Thalmann O; Siedel H; Vigilant L
Mol Ecol Resour; 2009 Jan; 9(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 21564562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Software for quantifying and simulating microsatellite genotyping error.
Johnson PC; Haydon DT
Bioinform Biol Insights; 2009 Nov; 1():71-5. PubMed ID: 20066126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noninvasive genotyping and Mendelian analysis of microsatellites in African savannah elephants.
Okello JB; Wittemyer G; Rasmussen HB; Douglas-Hamilton I; Nyakaana S; Arctander P; Siegismund HR
J Hered; 2005; 96(6):679-87. PubMed ID: 16251516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microsatellite scoring errors associated with noninvasive genotyping based on nuclear DNA amplified from shed hair.
Gagneux P; Boesch C; Woodruff DS
Mol Ecol; 1997 Sep; 6(9):861-8. PubMed ID: 9301074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying genotyping errors in noninvasive population genetics.
Broquet T; Petit E
Mol Ecol; 2004 Nov; 13(11):3601-8. PubMed ID: 15488016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using genomic relationship likelihood for parentage assignment.
Grashei KE; Ødegård J; Meuwissen THE
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 May; 50(1):26. PubMed ID: 29776335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of haplotype frequency estimation for biallelic loci, via the expectation-maximization algorithm for unphased diploid genotype data.
Fallin D; Schork NJ
Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Oct; 67(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 10954684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment and management of single nucleotide polymorphism genotype errors in genetic association analysis.
Gordon D; Ott J
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2001; ():18-29. PubMed ID: 11262939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A New Method for Noninvasive Genetic Sampling of Saliva in Ecological Research.
Lobo D; Godinho R; Álvares F; López-Bao JV; Rodríguez A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139765. PubMed ID: 26496352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DNA sampling from eggshell swabbing is widely applicable in wild bird populations as demonstrated in 23 species.
Martín-Gálvez D; Peralta-Sánchez JM; Dawson DA; Martín-Platero AM; Martínez-Bueno M; Burke T; Soler JJ
Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 May; 11(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 21481206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dealing with allelic dropout when reporting the evidential value in DNA relatedness analysis.
Buckleton J; Triggs C
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jul; 160(2-3):134-9. PubMed ID: 16226419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian parentage analysis with systematic accountability of genotyping error, missing data and false matching.
Christie MR; Tennessen JA; Blouin MS
Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 29(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 23365409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robustness of single-base extension against mismatches at the site of primer attachment in a clinical assay.
Kirsten H; Teupser D; Weissfuss J; Wolfram G; Emmrich F; Ahnert P
J Mol Med (Berl); 2007 Apr; 85(4):361-9. PubMed ID: 17160404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genotyping-by-sequencing for estimating relatedness in nonmodel organisms: Avoiding the trap of precise bias.
Attard CRM; Beheregaray LB; Möller LM
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; 18(3):381-390. PubMed ID: 29160928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR.
Taberlet P; Griffin S; Goossens B; Questiau S; Manceau V; Escaravage N; Waits LP; Bouvet J
Nucleic Acids Res; 1996 Aug; 24(16):3189-94. PubMed ID: 8774899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Familial searching on DNA mixtures with dropout.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():128-138. PubMed ID: 26905597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
