These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11805634)
1. A method to simulate in vivo cervical spine kinematics using in vitro compressive preload. Miura T; Panjabi MM; Cripton PA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jan; 27(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 11805634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relevance of using a compressive preload in the cervical spine: an experimental and numerical simulating investigation. Barrey C; Rousseau MA; Persohn S; Campana S; Perrin G; Skalli W Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():S155-65. PubMed ID: 25845316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of three-dimensional helical axes of the cervical spine between in vitro and in vivo testing. Jonas R; Demmelmaier R; Hacker SP; Wilke HJ Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):515-524. PubMed ID: 29074465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of compressive axial preload on the flexibility of the thoracolumbar spine. Tawackoli W; Marco R; Liebschner MA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 May; 29(9):988-93. PubMed ID: 15105669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Kinematics of the upper cervical spine in rotation: in vivo three-dimensional analysis. Ishii T; Mukai Y; Hosono N; Sakaura H; Nakajima Y; Sato Y; Sugamoto K; Yoshikawa H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):E139-44. PubMed ID: 15087810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study. Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neural space integrity of the lower cervical spine: effect of normal range of motion. Nuckley DJ; Konodi MA; Raynak GC; Ching RP; Mirza SK Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Mar; 27(6):587-95. PubMed ID: 11884906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is it possible to simulate physiologic loading conditions by applying pure moments? A comparison of in vivo and in vitro load components in an internal fixator. Wilke HJ; Rohlmann A; Neller S; Schultheiss M; Bergmann G; Graichen F; Claes LE Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Mar; 26(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 11246374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contact pressure in the facet joint during sagittal bending of the cadaveric cervical spine. Jaumard NV; Bauman JA; Weisshaar CL; Guarino BB; Welch WC; Winkelstein BA J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jul; 133(7):071004. PubMed ID: 21823743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Level-dependent coronal and axial moment-rotation corridors of degeneration-free cervical spines in lateral flexion. Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Stemper BD; Wolfla CE; Shender BS; Paskoff G J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 May; 89(5):1066-74. PubMed ID: 17473145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional flexibility characteristics of the human cervical spine in vivo. McClure P; Siegler S; Nobilini R Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jan; 23(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 9474729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]