These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11806472)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of Prime & Bond 2.1 for treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity.
    Swift EJ; May KN; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11806472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots.
    Ferrari M; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Oct; 12(5):243-9. PubMed ID: 10649916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of two adhesive composite cements for the suppression of dentinal cold sensitivity.
    Sensat ML; Brackett WW; Meinberg TA; Beatty MW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 12239480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity with resin adhesives: 4-week evaluation.
    Prati C; Cervellati F; Sanasi V; Montebugnoli L
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec; 14(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 11949798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer liner for cervical dentin hypersensitivity treatment.
    Tantbirojn D; Poolthong S; Leevailoj C; Srisawasdi S; Hodges JS; Randall RC
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 16555659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polymeric sealing of dentinal tubules to control sensitivity: preliminary observations.
    Ianzano JA; Gwinnett AJ; Westbay G
    Periodontal Clin Investig; 1993; 15(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 7919861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Gluma bonding system: a clinical evaluation of its various components for the treatment of hypersensitive root dentin.
    Davidson DF; Suzuki M
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1997 Jan; 63(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 9009533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of the role of glutardialdehyde in a one-bottle adhesive.
    Dondi dall'Orologio G; Lone A; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Oct; 15(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 12537345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical effectiveness of two agents on the treatment of tooth cervical hypersensitivity.
    Kakaboura A; Rahiotis C; Thomaidis S; Doukoudakis S
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 16296439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning electron microscopy examination of 3 different adhesive systems.
    Luz MA; Arana-Chavez VE; Netto NG
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Oct; 36(9):687-94. PubMed ID: 16163871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical comparison of gluma and Er:YAG laser treatment of cervically exposed hypersensitive dentin.
    Ehlers V; Ernst CP; Reich M; Kämmerer P; Willershausen B
    Am J Dent; 2012 Jun; 25(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 22988681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the efficacy in providing instant relief of dentin hypersensitivity of a new toothpaste containing 8.0% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride to a benchmark desensitizing toothpaste containing 2% potassium ion and 1450 ppm fluoride, and to a control toothpaste with 1450 ppm fluoride: a three-day clinical study in Mississauga, Canada.
    Ayad F; Ayad N; Delgado E; Zhang YP; DeVizio W; Cummins D; Mateo LR
    J Clin Dent; 2009; 20(4):115-22. PubMed ID: 19831164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Amalgambond on cervical sensitivity.
    Calamia JR; Styner DL; Rattet AH
    Am J Dent; 1995 Dec; 8(6):283-4. PubMed ID: 8695002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical dentin hypersensitivity. Part II: Associations with abfractive lesions.
    Coleman TA; Grippo JO; Kinderknecht KE
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(7):466-73. PubMed ID: 11203968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The comparison of a dentin adhesive with calcium hydroxide as a pulp-capping agent on the exposed pulps of human and sheep teeth.
    Ersin NK; Eronat N
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Apr; 36(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 15835423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Desensitizing effects of Gluma and Gluma 2000 on hypersensitive dentin.
    Dondi dall'Orologio G; Malferrari S
    Am J Dent; 1993 Dec; 6(6):283-6. PubMed ID: 7880476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive.
    Aw TC; Lepe X; Johnson GH; Mancl L
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 15724760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of solvent type on microtensile bond strength of a total-etch one-bottle adhesive system to moist or dry dentin.
    Cardoso Pde C; Lopes GC; Vieira LC; Baratieri LN
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 15986959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of CO2 laser in treatment of cervical dentinal hypersensitivity.
    Zhang C; Matsumoto K; Kimura Y; Harashima T; Takeda FH; Zhou H
    J Endod; 1998 Sep; 24(9):595-7. PubMed ID: 9922747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of a dentin desensitizer on the microtensile bond strength of two bonding systems.
    Seara SF; Erthal BS; Ribeiro M; Kroll L; Pereira GD
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 11933906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.