336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11807479)
1. The influence of tray type and other variables on the palatal depth of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
Frank RP; Thielke SM; Johnson GH
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11807479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of impression trays on the accuracy of stone casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
Mendez AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):383-8. PubMed ID: 3906093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of storage time on the accuracy and dimensional stability of reversible hydrocolloid impression material.
Schleier PE; Gardner FM; Nelson SK; Pashley DH
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 11552162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dimensional changes and pressure of dental stones set in silicone rubber impressions.
Teraoka F; Takahashi J
Dent Mater; 2000 Mar; 16(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 11203536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.
Millstein P; Maya A; Segura C
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 9781870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloids (alginates) for fixed prosthodontics. A comparison between irreversible hydrocolloid, reversible hydrocolloid, and addition silicone for use in the syringe-tray technique.
Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P
Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Apr; 106(2 Pt 1):651-60. PubMed ID: 9584912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vertical distortion in distal extension ridges and palatal area of casts made by different techniques.
Wang HY; Lu YC; Shiau YY; Tsou D
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Mar; 75(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 8648579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Irreversible hydrocolloids for crown and bridge impressions: effect of different treatments on compatibility of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material with type IV gypsums.
Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Lindén LA
Dent Mater; 1996 Mar; 12(2):74-82. PubMed ID: 9002847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional evaluation of extended pour alginate impression materials following variable storage time intervals and conditions.
Sayed ME; Gangadharappa P
Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(4):477-486. PubMed ID: 30127200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
