186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11808622)
1. A relational approach to moral decision-making: the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Sullivan PA; Goldzwig SR
Q J Speech; 1995 May; 81(2):167-90. PubMed ID: 11808622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
Bezanson RP
Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion and a nation at war.
First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
Binion G
Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.
Robertson JA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):24-8. PubMed ID: 1428831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.
Nivala J
Const Law J; 1993; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
Martin PA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
Peterfy A
J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Kassop N
PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
Benshoof J
Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
Maltz EM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion law today.
Field MA
J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
McConnell MW
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Equality theory and reproductive freedom.
Colker R
Tex J Women Law; 1994; 3(1):99-122. PubMed ID: 12645608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 1998 Jul; 339(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 9673308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The women of Roe v. Wade.
Glendon MA
Hum Life Rev; 2003; 29(3):31-8. PubMed ID: 14964200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
Sourial WH
Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The next abortion decision.
N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A34. PubMed ID: 16450474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Four-one-four.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
Schmutz SD
Houst Law Rev; 2002; 39(2):529-66. PubMed ID: 15212035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
