These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11808622)

  • 21. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Burying the dead: the case against revival of pre-Roe and pre-Casey abortion statutes in a post-Casey world.
    Scott TL
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):355-89. PubMed ID: 11656256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
    Ross CS
    Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
    Callahan D
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment?
    Walther KE
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000; 31(4):693-736. PubMed ID: 11962531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
    Allen AL
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
    Koslov TI
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The nature of the right to an abortion: a commentary on Professor Brownstein's analysis of Casey.
    West RL
    Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):961-7. PubMed ID: 11656423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
    Benshoof J
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. "Partial-birth abortion" and the Supreme Court.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2001 Jan; 344(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 11150367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Justice Blackmun and legal abortion--a besieged legacy to women's reproductive health.
    Cates W; Grimes DA; Hogue LL
    Am J Public Health; 1995 Sep; 85(9):1204-6. PubMed ID: 7661225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dworkin and Casey on abortion.
    Stroud S
    Philos Public Aff; 1996; 25(2):140-70. PubMed ID: 11660187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Oct; 16(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 3771197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sex selection abortion and the boomerang effect of a woman's right to choose: a paradox of the skeptics.
    Kohm LM
    William Mary J Women Law; 1997; 4(1):91-128. PubMed ID: 16389677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care.
    Benshoof J
    JAMA; 1993 May; 269(17):2249-57. PubMed ID: 8474205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Location and life: how Stenberg v. Carhart undercut Roe v. Wade.
    Stith R
    William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(2):255-78. PubMed ID: 15977326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The evolution of a constitutional right to an abortion. Fashioned in the 1970s and secured in the 1980s.
    Ford N
    J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):271-322. PubMed ID: 6355342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A world without Roe: how different would it be?
    Glendon MA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(4):30-1. PubMed ID: 2745061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.