These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11808622)
41. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart. Borgmann CE Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test. Burdick R Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The summer of our discontent. O'Connor J Hastings Cent Rep; 1992; 22(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 1428832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion. Heffernan L Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. State abortion statutes on the eve of the Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Terwilliger LM J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jun; 25(6):161-74. PubMed ID: 10123589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The principles and principals of abortion compromise. Wing KR J Health Polit Policy Law; 1993; 18(4):967-82. PubMed ID: 8120354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Roe v. Wade reaffirmed. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Aug; 13(4):21-2. PubMed ID: 6629744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Roe v. Wade and the euthanasia debate. Bopp J; Coleson RE Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 9114604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The right of privacy protects the doctor-patient relationship. Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK JAMA; 1990 Feb; 263(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 2296149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A woman's right, barely viable. N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():28. PubMed ID: 11646727 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable. Heller S Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy. Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice". Grant ER Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Rewriting Roe v. Wade. Regan DH Mich Law Rev; 1979 Aug; 77(7):1569-646. PubMed ID: 10245966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Abortion, absolutism, and compromise. Carter SL Yale Law J; 1991 Jun; 100(8):2747-66. PubMed ID: 11656152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Marital secrets. The emerging issue of abortion spousal notification laws. Shore BD J Leg Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):461-82. PubMed ID: 6983551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision. Kendall CC John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions. Appleton SF Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]