These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11808622)

  • 61. Rethinking Roe v. Wade: defending the abortion right in the face of contemporary opposition.
    Manninen BA
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Dec; 10(12):33-46. PubMed ID: 21161841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Criminal abortion revisited.
    Buell SW
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 66(6):1774-831. PubMed ID: 11652642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
    Bryant MD
    Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Case reopens abortion issue for justices.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A19. PubMed ID: 16450459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
    Wardle LD
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Limiting state regulation of reproductive decisions.
    Glantz LH
    Am J Public Health; 1984 Feb; 74(2):168-9. PubMed ID: 6691534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [The fragility of the US Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade].
    Merchant J
    Med Sci (Paris); 2006; 22(8-9):773-5. PubMed ID: 16962056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
    Intromasso C
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Abortion and the Pied Piper of compromise.
    Clark AE
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 May; 68(2):265-329. PubMed ID: 11656365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):197-203. PubMed ID: 2603862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The Supreme Court, abortion, and the jurisprudence of class.
    Mariner WK
    Am J Public Health; 1992 Nov; 82(11):1556-62. PubMed ID: 1443311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. In new court, Roe may stand, so foes look to limit its scope.
    Toner R; Liptak A
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 16060018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The right to procreate and in utero fetal therapy.
    Robertson JA
    J Leg Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):333-66. PubMed ID: 6983547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Abortion USA.
    Lancet; 1989 Apr; 1(8643):879-80. PubMed ID: 2564953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75.
    Paltrow LM
    Am J Public Health; 2022 Sep; 112(9):1313-1317. PubMed ID: 35969822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Comment: United States Supreme Court upholds right to abortion subject to increased state regulation. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Cerny RA
    J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):212-5. PubMed ID: 10183821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. It's my body, it's my choice: the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
    Kushnir TF
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2004; 35(4):1117-88. PubMed ID: 15732189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Feminist theory confronts US Supreme Court rhetoric: the case of abortion rights.
    Binion G
    Int J Law Policy Family; 1997; 11(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 16848074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The Supreme Court, the Texas Abortion Law (SB8), and the Beginning of the End of Roe v Wade?
    Cohen IG; Adashi EY; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2021 Oct; 326(15):1473-1474. PubMed ID: 34554180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.