These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11808680)
1. Antenatal genetic testing and the right to remain in ignorance. Bennett R Theor Med Bioeth; 2001 Sep; 22(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 11808680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions. Charo RA Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproductive rights and the Human Genome Project. Walsh J South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 1994; 4(1):145-81. PubMed ID: 11660643 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality. Shakespeare T Disabil Soc; 1998 Nov; 13(5):665-81. PubMed ID: 11660717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prenatal screening and the culture of motherhood. Andrews LB Hastings Law J; 1996 Apr; 47(4):967-1006. PubMed ID: 11656839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legislating to preserve women's autonomy during pregnancy. Feitshans IL Med Law; 1995; 14(5-6):397-412. PubMed ID: 8868499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom. Bayer R Milbank Q; 1990; 68(Suppl. 2):179-204. PubMed ID: 11653914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protecting parents' freedom to have children with genetic differences. Shepherd L Univ Ill Law Rev; 1995; 4():761-812. PubMed ID: 11658115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to genetic ignorance confirmed. Takala T Bioethics; 1999 Jul; 13(3-4):288-93. PubMed ID: 11657239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Robertson JA Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights? Gallagher J Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The body invaded: medical surveillance of women as reproducers. Terry J Social Rev; 1989; 89(3):13-43. PubMed ID: 11655979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. International perspectives on ethics and human genetics. Wertz DC Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1411-56. PubMed ID: 11657044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse? Leavine BA Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Human Genome Initiative, women's rights and reproductive decisions. Charo RA Reprod Health Matters; 1994 Nov; No. 4():80-6. PubMed ID: 11660737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The mother. Tisdale S Hippocrates (Sausalito); 1988; 2(3):64-72. PubMed ID: 11650165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Feminist perspectives on reproductive technologies: the politics of motherhood. Chokr NN Technol Soc; 1992; 14(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 11652187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate. Bennett B Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. When pregnant patients refuse interventions. Tauer CA AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1993; 4(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 8220374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]