These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11809282)
1. Recruitment of women into trials. Bartlett EE Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9301):165. PubMed ID: 11809282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding for Clinical Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. Ehrhardt S; Appel LJ; Meinert CL JAMA; 2015 Dec; 314(23):2566-7. PubMed ID: 26670975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical Infection Society--trials and tribulations: the importance of clinical trials. Dellinger EP Arch Surg; 1998 Nov; 133(11):1192-7. PubMed ID: 9820350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. There is no women's health crisis. Satel SL Public Interest; 1998; 130():21-33. PubMed ID: 11658109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding. Max MB J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Does exclusion or inclusion better protect women? Shultz MM J Gend Specif Med; 1998; 1(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11281007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Women in clinical trials--a portfolio for success. Buring JE N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(7):505-6. PubMed ID: 10944570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Women and health research: working for change. Baylis F J Clin Ethics; 1996; 7(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 8981194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Basic and clinical research: what is the most appropriate weighting in a public investment portfolio? Johnston SC; Hauser SL Ann Neurol; 2006 Jul; 60(1):9A-11A. PubMed ID: 16802300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Enrollment of women in cardiovascular clinical trials funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Harris DJ; Douglas PS N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(7):475-80. PubMed ID: 10944565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The sex-bias myth in medicine. Kadar AG Atl Mon; 1994 Aug; 274(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 11659876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Growing pains for NIH grant review. Bonetta L Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women not shortchanged in trials? Holden C Science; 1997 Mar; 275(5306):1571-3. PubMed ID: 11644903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Good news and bad news. Garrison H; Bartholme N Physiologist; 2006 Aug; 49(4):201, 203-5. PubMed ID: 16915995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sociology. The gender gap in NIH grant applications. Ley TJ; Hamilton BH Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5907):1472-4. PubMed ID: 19056961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research funding: the view from NIH. Insel TR; Volkow N; Li TK Am J Psychiatry; 2006 Dec; 163(12):2043-5. PubMed ID: 17151151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Women subjects in NIH-funded clinical research literature: lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex. Vidaver RM; Lafleur B; Tong C; Bradshaw R; Marts SA J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000 Jun; 9(5):495-504. PubMed ID: 10883941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Declines in funding of NIH R01 research grants. Mandel HG; Vesell ES Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5792):1387-8. PubMed ID: 16959989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sustaining the engine of U.S. biomedical discovery. Heinig SJ; Krakower JY; Dickler HB; Korn D N Engl J Med; 2007 Sep; 357(10):1042-7. PubMed ID: 17804852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]