These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11809317)

  • 1. A Prolog-based centroid algorithm for isovolume extraction from finite element torso simulations.
    Russomanno DJ; Hicks K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2002 Feb; 67(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 11809317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extracting isovolumes from three-dimensional torso geometry using PROLOG.
    Replogle JA; Russomanno DJ; de Jongh AL; Claydon FJ
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 1998 Mar; 2(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 10719507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A convenient scheme for coupling a finite element curvilinear mesh to a finite element voxel mesh: application to the heart.
    Hopenfeld B
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Nov; 5():60. PubMed ID: 17112373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulated internal defibrillation in humans using an anatomically realistic three-dimensional finite element model of the thorax.
    Kinst TF; Sweeney MO; Lehr JL; Eisenberg SR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 May; 8(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 9160230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient-specific anisotropic model of human trunk based on MR data.
    Courchesne O; Guibault F; Parent S; Cheriet F
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2015 Sep; 31(9):e02724. PubMed ID: 25981718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A medical imaging and visualization toolkit in Java.
    Huang S; Baimouratov R; Xiao P; Ananthasubramaniam A; Nowinski WL
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Mar; 19(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 16323064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element modeling of subcutaneous implantable defibrillator electrodes in an adult torso.
    Jolley M; Stinstra J; Tate J; Pieper S; Macleod R; Chu L; Wang P; Triedman JK
    Heart Rhythm; 2010 May; 7(5):692-8. PubMed ID: 20230927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods and framework for visualizing higher-order finite elements.
    Schroeder WJ; Bertel F; Malaterre M; Thompson D; Pébay PP; O'Bara R; Tendulkar S
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(4):446-60. PubMed ID: 16805255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. GeoBuilder: a geometric algorithm visualization and debugging system for 2D and 3D geometric computing.
    Wei JD; Tsai MH; Lee GC; Huang JH; Lee DT
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2009; 15(2):234-48. PubMed ID: 19147888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between automatically generated linear and parabolic tetrahedra when used to mesh a human femur.
    Polgar K; Viceconti M; O'Connor JJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2001; 215(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 11323989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration.
    Brock KK; Sharpe MB; Dawson LA; Kim SM; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1647-59. PubMed ID: 16013724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tetrahedral versus hexahedral finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Nov; 28(9):916-24. PubMed ID: 16464628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of ray profile modeling on resolution recovery in clinical CT.
    Hofmann C; Knaup M; Kachelrieß M
    Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021907. PubMed ID: 24506628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
    Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dental application of novel finite element analysis software for three-dimensional finite element modeling of a dentulous mandible from its computed tomography images.
    Nakamura K; Tajima K; Chen KK; Nagamatsu Y; Kakigawa H; Masumi SI
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Dec; 227(12):1312-8. PubMed ID: 24077258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical analysis of electrical defibrillation. The parallel approach.
    Ng KT; Hutchinson SA; Gao S
    J Electrocardiol; 1995; 28 Suppl():15-20. PubMed ID: 8656104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Construction of patient-specific surface models from MR images: application to bioelectromagnetism.
    Lötjönen J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2003 Oct; 72(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 12941520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Virtual volume resection using multi-resolution triangular representation of B-spline surfaces.
    Ruskó L; Mátéka I; Kriston A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Aug; 111(2):315-29. PubMed ID: 23726362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sparse regularization for EIT reconstruction incorporating structural information derived from medical imaging.
    Gong B; Schullcke B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Jun; 37(6):843-62. PubMed ID: 27203627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A universal algorithm for an improved finite element mesh generation Mesh quality assessment in comparison to former automated mesh-generators and an analytic model.
    Kaminsky J; Rodt T; Gharabaghi A; Forster J; Brand G; Samii M
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jun; 27(5):383-94. PubMed ID: 15863347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.