112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11809942)
1. Professional ethics. Data hoarding blocks progress in genetics.
Stokstad E
Science; 2002 Jan; 295(5555):599. PubMed ID: 11809942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Terms of access to cloned mice comes under researchers' fire.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6753):515-6. PubMed ID: 10524609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Debates over credit for the annotation of genomes.
Nature; 2000 Jun; 405(6788):719. PubMed ID: 10866159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring a moral landscape: genetic science and ethics.
Nicholas B
Hypatia; 2001; 16(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11789521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethics. Forbidden knowledge.
Kempner J; Perlis CS; Merz JF
Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5711):854. PubMed ID: 15705829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Code of ethical principles for genetics professionals: an explication.
Baumiller RC; Cunningham G; Fisher N; Fox L; Henderson M; Lebel R; McGrath G; Pelias MZ; Porter I; Seydel F; Roper Willson N
Am J Med Genet; 1996 Oct; 65(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 9240740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Who has the ultimate responsible for publishing clinical research results?
Wilde H; Sitprija V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Aug; 84(8):1217-20. PubMed ID: 11758861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Young, worldly and unhelpful all miss out on data sharing.
Dalton R
Nature; 2000 Mar; 404(6773):6. PubMed ID: 10716414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical issues in cardiovascular publications: observations during 25 years as an editor.
Hildner FJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Oct; 60(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 14517925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clear-cut publication rules prove elusive.
Marshall E
Science; 2002 Mar; 295(5560):1625. PubMed ID: 11872813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Data-sharing and data-withholding in genetics and the life sciences: results of a national survey of technology transfer officers.
Campbell EG; Bendavid E
J Health Care Law Policy; 2003; 6(2):241-55. PubMed ID: 15017960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Show me the data.
Rossner M; Van Epps H; Hill E
J Gen Physiol; 2008 Jan; 131(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 18166622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The publication process itself was the major cause of publication bias in genetic epidemiology.
Calnan M; Smith GD; Sterne JA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1312-8. PubMed ID: 17098574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neuroscientist: my data published without authorization are 'misleading'.
Abbott A
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7200):6-7. PubMed ID: 18596765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Research in sciences of education. State of the art and points of view].
Tomamichel S; Clerc F
Rech Soins Infirm; 2005 Dec; (83):4-17. PubMed ID: 16422341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetics. No longer de-identified.
McGuire AL; Gibbs RA
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5772):370-1. PubMed ID: 16627725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Commentary on "The social responsibilities of biological scientists" (S.J. Reiser and R.E. Bulger).
Beckwith J; Geller LN
Sci Eng Ethics; 1997 Apr; 3(2):145-8. PubMed ID: 11657885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A preliminary investigation of ethical problems in publication and research.
Holaday M; Yost TE
J Soc Behav Pers; 1995; 10(2):281-91. PubMed ID: 15719502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Part I: what is the requirement for data sharing?
de Wolf VA; Sieber JE; Steel PM; Zarate AO
IRB; 2005; 27(6):12-6. PubMed ID: 16425480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Professional practice. Scientists keep some data to themselves.
Holden C
Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5760):448. PubMed ID: 16439626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
