These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11810088)

  • 1. Sublingual misoprostol for the induction of labor at term.
    Shetty A; Danielian P; Templeton A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 186(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 11810088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
    Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sublingual compared with oral misoprostol in term labour induction: a randomised controlled trial.
    Shetty A; Mackie L; Danielian P; Rice P; Templeton A
    BJOG; 2002 Jun; 109(6):645-50. PubMed ID: 12118642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sublingual compared with vaginal misoprostol for labour induction at term: a randomised controlled trial.
    Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Krikstolaitis R; Gintautas V; Nadisauskiene R
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1431-7. PubMed ID: 17083652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oral, vaginal and sublingual misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Bartusevicius A; Barcaite E; Nadisauskiene R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Oct; 91(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 16109419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial protocol.
    Gattás DSMB; da Silva Junior JR; Souza ASR; Feitosa FE; de Amorim MMR
    Reprod Health; 2018 Apr; 15(1):65. PubMed ID: 29669596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol tablets in induction of labour at term.
    Shetty A; Danielian P; Templeton A
    BJOG; 2001 Mar; 108(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 11281461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized prospective placebo-controlled study.
    Zahran KM; Shahin AY; Abdellah MS; Elsayh KI
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1054-60. PubMed ID: 20144171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
    Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gattás DSMB; de Amorim MMR; Feitosa FEL; da Silva-Junior JR; Ribeiro LCG; Souza GFA; Souza ASR
    Reprod Health; 2020 Apr; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 32272959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 8694043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    le Roux PA; Olarogun JO; Penny J; Anthony J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 11814497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sublingual vs. vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Feitosa FE; Sampaio ZS; Alencar CA; Amorim MM; Passini R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Aug; 94(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 16828095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sublingual misoprostol compared to artificial rupture of membranes plus oxytocin infusion for labour induction in nulliparous women with a favourable cervix at term.
    Lo TK; Lau WL; Wong KS; Tang LC
    Hong Kong Med J; 2006 Oct; 12(5):345-50. PubMed ID: 17028353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation.
    Jha N; Sagili H; Jayalakshmi D; Lakshminarayanan S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25055933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pilot study of labor induction with titrated oral misoprostol.
    Cheng SY; Chen TC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 45(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17175468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.