139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11811276)
1. Improved national Croatian diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for premalignant lesions of the uterine cervix with some cost-benefit aspects.
Ljubojević N; Babić S; Audy-Jurković S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Jukić S; Babić D; Grubisić G; Radaković B; Ljubojević-Grgec D
Coll Antropol; 2001 Dec; 25(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 11811276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnostic approaches of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia].
Yang SL; Kong WM; Wu YM; Duan W; Zhu L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 48(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 24016476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens.
Kumar N; Bongiovanni M; Molliet MJ; Pelte MF; Egger JF; Pache JC
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):351-8. PubMed ID: 18522633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Update on ASCCP consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical screening tests and cervical histology.
Apgar BS; Kittendorf AL; Bettcher CM; Wong J; Kaufman AJ
Am Fam Physician; 2009 Jul; 80(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 19621855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening properties of human papillomavirus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion smears: a prospective study.
Dane C; Batmaz G; Dane B; Cetin A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2009 Apr; 13(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19302953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix: morphology and molecular pathology].
Horn LC; Klostermann K
Pathologe; 2011 Nov; 32 Suppl 2():242-54. PubMed ID: 21909794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cytological & colposcopic evaluation in premalignant & early malignant lesions of the cervix.
Singh V; Verma K; Bhargava VL
Indian J Med Res; 1983 Jul; 78 Suppl():54-9. PubMed ID: 6654431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy.
Cox JT; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1406-12. PubMed ID: 12824970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with atypical squamous or glandular cells of undetermined significance cytology: a prospective study.
Wensveen C; Kagie M; Veldhuizen R; De Groot C; Denny L; Zwinderman K; Trimbos B
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Sep; 82(9):883-9. PubMed ID: 12911453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical Significance of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance among Patients Undergoing Cervical Conization.
Nishimura M; Miyatake T; Nakashima A; Miyoshi A; Mimura M; Nagamatsu M; Ogita K; Yokoi T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8145-7. PubMed ID: 26745052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Only a small fraction of high-grade cervical lesions are discovered after an interpretation of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance when using imager-assisted, liquid-based papanicolaou tests and the Bethesda 2001 system.
Khan KA; Smith DA; Thrall MJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 137(7):936-41. PubMed ID: 22994456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions.
Sopracordevole F; Clemente N; Alessandrini L; Di Giuseppe J; Cigolot F; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A; Canzonieri V
Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Mar; 213(3):210-216. PubMed ID: 28214204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia topography and the risk of conisation].
Kałuzyński A; Olszak A; Smolarz B; Kowalczyk A; Kulig A
Ginekol Pol; 2005 Oct; 76(10):763-9. PubMed ID: 16417091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis based on the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion Triage Study (ALTS).
Kulasingam SL; Kim JJ; Lawrence WF; Mandelblatt JS; Myers ER; Schiffman M; Solomon D; Goldie SJ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jan; 98(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 16418511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pooled analysis of the performance of liquid-based cytology in population-based cervical cancer screening studies in China.
Pan QJ; Hu SY; Zhang X; Ci PW; Zhang WH; Guo HQ; Cao J; Zhao FH; Lytwyn A; Qiao YL
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Sep; 121(9):473-82. PubMed ID: 23907807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnostic implications of atypical squamous cells of unknown significance with abnormal DNA ploidy for early cervical lesions].
Mei JH; Xu S; Han YL; Tu Y; Xiong YF; Yu YQ
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 42(12):829-32. PubMed ID: 24507102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of cytologic screening results of the cervix.
Yalti S; Gürbüz B; Bilgiç R; Cakar Y; Eren S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(2):292-4. PubMed ID: 15823114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of human papillomavirus in screening for cervical cancer and precancerous lesions.
Wang JL; Yang YZ; Dong WW; Sun J; Tao HT; Li RX; Hu Y
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(5):2979-82. PubMed ID: 23803065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of atypical squamous cells, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1.
Boardman LA; Kennedy CM
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):599-614; ix. PubMed ID: 19061819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
