167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11811453)
1. Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model.
Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):3002-7. PubMed ID: 11811453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine.
Lutaaya E; Misztal I; Mabry JW; Short T; Timm HH; Holzbauer R
J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2263-6. PubMed ID: 12350003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of selected and control lines of Duroc and Yorkshire pigs and their reciprocal crossbred progeny.
Bereskin B
J Anim Sci; 1983 Oct; 57(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 6643303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic correlations between two strains of Durocs and crossbreds from differing production environments for slaughter traits.
Zumbach B; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Holl J; Herring W; Long T
J Anim Sci; 2007 Apr; 85(4):901-8. PubMed ID: 17178815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal definition of contemporary groups for crossbred pigs in a joint purebred and crossbred genetic evaluation.
Steyn Y; Lourenco DA; Chen CY; Valente BD; Holl J; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2021 Jan; 99(1):. PubMed ID: 33313883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of dominance variance for live body weight in a crossbred population of pigs.
Dufrasne M; Faux P; Piedboeuf M; Wavreille J; Gengler N
J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4313-8. PubMed ID: 25149333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits.
Wei M; van der Werf JH
J Anim Sci; 1995 Aug; 73(8):2220-6. PubMed ID: 8567456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selection for social genetic effects in purebreds increases growth in crossbreds.
Ask B; Pedersen LV; Christensen OF; Nielsen HM; Turner SP; Nielsen B
Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):15. PubMed ID: 33579188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genomic BLUP including additive and dominant variation in purebreds and F1 crossbreds, with an application in pigs.
Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Elsen JM; Misztal I; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jan; 48():6. PubMed ID: 26825279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A bivariate genomic model with additive, dominance and inbreeding depression effects for sire line and three-way crossbred pigs.
Christensen OF; Nielsen B; Su G; Xiang T; Madsen P; Ostersen T; Velander I; Strathe AB
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Aug; 51(1):45. PubMed ID: 31426753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of dominance variance in purebred Yorkshire swine.
Culbertson MS; Mabry JW; Misztal I; Gengler N; Bertrand JK; Varona L
J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 9498351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Gene differential expression of liver tissues in crossbred versus purebred chicken and their relationship with heterosis of meat trait].
Wang D; Zhang Y; Sun DX; Yu Y; Xu GY; Li JY
Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2004 Mar; 31(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 15195564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nurse capacity, fertility, and litter size in crossbred sows and genetic correlation to purebred sow information.
Nielsen B; Christensen OF; Velander I
J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1827-33. PubMed ID: 27285680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of pen mates on growth, backfat depth, and longissimus muscle area of swine.
Hsu WL; Johnson RK; Van Vleck LD
J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):895-902. PubMed ID: 19933426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Heat stress effects on farrowing rate in sows: genetic parameter estimation using within-line and crossbred models.
Bloemhof S; Kause A; Knol EF; Van Arendonk JA; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2012 Jul; 90(7):2109-19. PubMed ID: 22267000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variance components and heritabilities for sow productivity traits estimated from purebred versus crossbred sows.
Ehlers MJ; Mabry JW; Bertrand JK; Stalder KJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Oct; 122(5):318-24. PubMed ID: 16191040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Purebred and Crossbred Genomic Evaluation and Mate Allocation Strategies To Exploit Dominance in Pig Crossbreeding Schemes.
González-Diéguez D; Tusell L; Bouquet A; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2829-2841. PubMed ID: 32554752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
