These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11811820)

  • 21. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
    Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Symmetry-based detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast MRI.
    Srikantha A; Harz M; Wang L; Platel B; Mann RM; Hahn HK; Peitgen HO
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S158-9. PubMed ID: 23083573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography.
    Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Gröschel T; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S4-5. PubMed ID: 23083596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical indications: what is the evidence?
    Lehman CD
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S82-4. PubMed ID: 23083615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimized density-weighted imaging for dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D-MR mammography.
    Gutberlet M; Roth A; Hahn D; Köstler H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 33(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 21274974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
    Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer.
    D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
    Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The development and evaluation of CADMIUM: a prototype system to assist in the interpretation of mammograms.
    Taylor P; Fox J; Pokropek AT
    Med Image Anal; 1999 Dec; 3(4):321-37. PubMed ID: 10709699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computer-aided detection of malignancy with magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
    Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2006 Jun; 21(4):1-3. PubMed ID: 16832927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mono- and multimodal registration of optical breast images.
    Pearlman PC; Adams A; Elias SG; Mali WP; Viergever MA; Pluim JP
    J Biomed Opt; 2012 Aug; 17(8):080901-1. PubMed ID: 23224161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
    Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Focal transitional mastitis in MR-mammography: preliminary findings.
    Kaiser CG; Krammer J; Schönberg SO; Kaiser WA; Wasser K
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S72-3. PubMed ID: 23083610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical Utility of Real-Time MR-Navigated Ultrasound with Supine Breast MRI for Suspicious Enhancing Lesions Not Identified on Second-Look Ultrasound.
    Kang DK; Jung Y; Han S; Kim JY; Kim TH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 43(2):412-420. PubMed ID: 27780660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Breast imaging. Picturing the latest breast cancer detection methods.
    Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2006 May; 10(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 16585920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital mammography: clinical image evaluation.
    Bassett LW; Hoyt AC; Oshiro T
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):903-15. PubMed ID: 20868893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of diffuse optical tomography, ultrasound elastography and mammography in the diagnosis of breast tumors.
    Zhang H; Qin D; Yang Z; Wang K; Sun F; Li B; Cui G
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24210860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Diagnostic techniques in breast cancer detection. Part I: imaging methods and their modifications].
    Slubowski T; Slubowska M; Wojciechowski A
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 May; 78(5):388-92. PubMed ID: 17867332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computer-aided diagnosis complements full-field digital mammography.
    Nishikawa RM
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Sep; 21(9):47-51, 75. PubMed ID: 10623317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.