These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

934 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11812579)

  • 1. Bias and causal associations in observational research.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Lancet; 2002 Jan; 359(9302):248-52. PubMed ID: 11812579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias.
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Llorca J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 15252064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What random assignment does and does not do.
    Krause MS; Howard KI
    J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jul; 59(7):751-66. PubMed ID: 12808582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
    Shahar E; Shahar DJ
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.
    Greenland S
    Epidemiology; 2003 May; 14(3):300-6. PubMed ID: 12859030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.
    Cox E; Martin BC; Van Staa T; Garbe E; Siebert U; Johnson ML
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19744292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
    Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2005 Jul; 3(6):147-67. PubMed ID: 21631747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpreting the term selection bias in medical research.
    Mark DH
    Fam Med; 1997 Feb; 29(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 9048175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 15(3):436-40. PubMed ID: 19366394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection criteria and generalizability within the counterfactual framework: explaining the paradox of antidepressant-induced suicidality?
    Weisberg HI; Hayden VC; Pontes VP
    Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 19342462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False alarms and pseudo-epidemics: the limitations of observational epidemiology.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):920-7. PubMed ID: 22996110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bounding formulas for selection bias.
    Huang TH; Lee WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 182(10):868-72. PubMed ID: 26519426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodologic issues in observational studies.
    Hartz A; Marsh JL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):33-42. PubMed ID: 12897594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
    Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
    J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selection.
    Williamson EJ; Aitken Z; Lawrie J; Dharmage SC; Burgess JA; Forbes AB
    Respirology; 2014 Apr; 19(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24447391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics of good causation studies.
    Daya S
    Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 12806562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
    Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias in clinical epidemiological study designs.
    Rivas-Ruiz F; Pérez-Vicente S; González-Ramírez AR
    Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 2013; 41(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 23036443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias, Confounding, and Interaction: Lions and Tigers, and Bears, Oh My!
    Vetter TR; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Sep; 125(3):1042-1048. PubMed ID: 28817531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 47.