These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11813394)

  • 41. Bactericidal effects of acidic electrolyzed water on the dental unit waterline.
    Kohno S; Kawata T; Kaku M; Fuita T; Tsutsui K; Ohtani J; Tenjo K; Motokawa M; Tohma Y; Shigekawa M; Kamata H; Tanne K
    Jpn J Infect Dis; 2004 Apr; 57(2):52-4. PubMed ID: 15118209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Resistance of Legionella to disinfection in hot water distribution systems.
    Saby S; Vidal A; Suty H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(8):15-28. PubMed ID: 16312947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Attitudes of Irish and European dentists to water quality of dental unit water systems.
    Burke FM; O'Mullane D; O'Sullivan M
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2005; 51(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 16167620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Microbial community structure in biofilms and water of a drinking water distribution system determined by lipid biomarkers.
    Keinänen MM; Martikainen PJ; Korhonen LK; Suutari MH
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(5):143-7. PubMed ID: 12701920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effects of UV disinfection on distribution pipe biofilm growth and pathogen incidence within the greater Stockholm area, Sweden.
    Långmark J; Storey MV; Ashbolt NJ; Stenström TA
    Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(15):3327-36. PubMed ID: 17588636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. In situ characterization of nitrifying biofilm: minimizing biomass loss and preserving perspective.
    Delatolla R; Tufenkji N; Comeau Y; Lamarre D; Gadbois A; Berk D
    Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(6):1775-87. PubMed ID: 19217138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of flow regimes on the presence of Legionella within the biofilm of a model plumbing system.
    Liu Z; Lin YE; Stout JE; Hwang CC; Vidic RD; Yu VL
    J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 101(2):437-42. PubMed ID: 16882152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. An investigation of the efficacy of super-oxidised (Optident/Sterilox) water for the disinfection of dental unit water lines.
    Martin MV; Gallagher MA
    Br Dent J; 2005 Mar; 198(6):353-4; discussion 347. PubMed ID: 15789102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of pipe materials and VBNC cells on culturable bacteria in a chlorinated drinking water model system.
    Lee DG; Park SJ; Kim SJ
    J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 17(9):1558-62. PubMed ID: 18062238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Biofilm formation and the survival of Salmonella Typhimurium on parsley.
    Lapidot A; Romling U; Yaron S
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 109(3):229-33. PubMed ID: 16616389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Microbiology, chemistry and biofilm development in a pilot drinking water distribution system with copper and plastic pipes.
    Lehtola MJ; Miettinen IT; Keinänen MM; Kekki TK; Laine O; Hirvonen A; Vartiainen T; Martikainen PJ
    Water Res; 2004 Oct; 38(17):3769-79. PubMed ID: 15350429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The efficacy of a continuous-use stabilized chlorine dioxide dental unit waterline cleaner and the evaluation of two water sampling methods.
    Porteous NB; Cooley RL; Lau CA
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):472-6; quiz 477. PubMed ID: 15055639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantification of water and biomass in small colony variant PAO1 biofilms by confocal Raman microspectroscopy.
    Sandt C; Smith-Palmer T; Comeau J; Pink D
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Jul; 83(6):1171-82. PubMed ID: 19529929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of the effect of two chlorhexidine preparations on biofilm bacteria in vitro: a three-dimensional quantitative analysis.
    Shen Y; Qian W; Chung C; Olsen I; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):981-5. PubMed ID: 19567319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of frequent clinical use of dental unit waterlines on contamination.
    Porteous NB; Partida MN
    N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):20-4. PubMed ID: 19548488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Many biofilm questions still unanswered.
    Boriskin JM
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2001 Dec; 29(12):803. PubMed ID: 11813394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Electron microscopic examination of dental unit waterlines biofilm.
    Szymańska J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2005; 12(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 16457488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A between-patient disinfection method to control water line contamination and biofilm inside dental units.
    Montebugnoli L; Chersoni S; Prati C; Dolci G
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Apr; 56(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 15066741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Biofilm and dental unit waterlines.
    Szymanska J
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2003; 10(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 14677905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Reducing bacterial counts in dental unit waterlines: distilled water vs. antimicrobial agents.
    Kettering JD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Stephens JA; Naylor WP; Zhang W
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 30(10):735-41. PubMed ID: 12403476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.