These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11813680)

  • 41. In practice: how going digital will affect the dental office.
    Farman AG; Levato CM; Gane D; Scarfe WC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 139 Suppl():14S-19S. PubMed ID: 18539867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Digital dental radiographic technique and its clinical application].
    Zhang T; Zhao Y; Zhang Z
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Jul; 35(4):261-2. PubMed ID: 11780503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The deal on digital: the status of radiographic imaging.
    Miles DA
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Dec; 22(12):1057-62; quiz 1064. PubMed ID: 11887668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Better imaging: the advantages of digital radiography.
    van der Stelt PF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 139 Suppl():7S-13S. PubMed ID: 18539866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography.
    Hildebolt CF; Couture RA; Whiting BR
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Apr; 44(2):273-97, vi. PubMed ID: 10740769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Phosphor plate radiography: an integral component of the filmless practice.
    Benjamin S
    Dent Today; 2010 Nov; 29(11):89. PubMed ID: 21133024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Integrating images in dental manufacturing technology: the prosthetic value chain.
    Scarfe WC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Sep; 112(3):281-3. PubMed ID: 21827958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Digital radiography: considerations for pediatric dentistry.
    Williamson GF
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 17(8):556, 558. PubMed ID: 16323460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dental digital radiography: a survey of quality aspects.
    Hellén-Halme K; Rohlin M; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 2005; 29(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 16035351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
    Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. How going digital will affect the dental office.
    Farman AG; Levato CM; Gane D; Scarfe WC
    J Okla Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 99(10):16-21. PubMed ID: 19093388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Use of direct digital radiography at remote dental facilities.
    Bartoloni JA
    Mil Med; 2000 Dec; 165(12):925-8. PubMed ID: 11149063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Computed dental radiography used to reproduce antemortem film position.
    Hubar JS; Carr RF
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Mar; 44(2):401-4. PubMed ID: 10097371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Digital radiography in the dental practice: an update.
    Makdissi J; Pawar R
    Prim Dent J; 2013 Jan; 2(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 23717893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices.
    Berkhout WE; Sanderink GC; Van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 12775667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluating phantom image quality parameters to optimise patient radiation dose in dental digital radiology.
    Gonzalez L; Vano E; Fernandez R; Ziraldo V; Delgado J; Delgado V; Moro J; Ubeda C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22232776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of the efficacy and technical accuracy of different rectangular collimators for intraoral radiography.
    Zhang W; Abramovitch K; Thames W; Leon IL; Colosi DC; Goren AD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e22-8. PubMed ID: 19464209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.
    Santoro M; Jarjoura K; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16527629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Digital cephalometrics].
    Ongkosuwito EM; Katsaros C; Bodegom JC; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2004 Jul; 111(7):266-70. PubMed ID: 15315105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pre-clinical performance comparing intraoral film and CCD-based systems.
    Sommers TM; Mauriello SM; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Tyndall DA
    J Dent Hyg; 2002; 76(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 11935928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.