These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11813726)
1. The federal role in influencing research ethics education and standards in science. Dustira AK Prof Ethics; 1996; 5(1-2):139-56. PubMed ID: 11813726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts. Mastroianni AC; Kahn JP Account Res; 1999; 7(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11657564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Commentary on "Confronting misconduct in the 1980s and 1990s: what has and has not been accomplished?" (N.H. Steneck). Friedman PJ Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):177-8. PubMed ID: 11657854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: what has and has not been accomplished? Steneck NH Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 11657853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower. Poon P J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Trouble in the laboratory: probing the science of a controversial paper. Fackelmann KA Sci News; 1990 Mar; 137(13):200-203, 205. PubMed ID: 11650334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Which ethics for science and public policy? Irving DN; Shamoo AE Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):77-100. PubMed ID: 11652298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Misconduct in research: an issue of science policy and practice. Chubin DE Minerva; 1985; 23(2):175-202. PubMed ID: 11645859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Commentary on "Changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. Government's attempt to define research misconduct" (D.H. Guston). Shipp AC Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 11657851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical values in the education of biomedical researchers. Heitman E Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(4 Suppl):S40-4. PubMed ID: 11658244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fraud and the norms of science. Schmaus W Sci Technol Human Values; 1983; 8(4):12-22. PubMed ID: 11651715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulation of animal experimentation: United States of America. Orlans FB Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):138-52. PubMed ID: 11649993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Commentary on "Developing a federal policy on research misconduct" (S. Francis). Ryan KJ Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):273-4. PubMed ID: 11657865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Developing a federal policy on research misconduct. Francis S Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 11657864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Too good to be true. Colt GH Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Office of Scientific Integrity. Hamilton DP Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Jun; 2(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 11645744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The institutional context for research. Berger EM; Gert B Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):17-46. PubMed ID: 11655037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Current NIH perspectives on misconduct in science. Miers ML Am Psychol; 1985 Jul; 40(7):831-5. PubMed ID: 4037514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]