235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11814216)
1. Rethinking the word frequency effect: the neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing.
McDonald SA; Shillcock RC
Lang Speech; 2001 Sep; 44(Pt 3):295-323. PubMed ID: 11814216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A database of orthography-semantics consistency (OSC) estimates for 15,017 English words.
Marelli M; Amenta S
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1482-1495. PubMed ID: 29372490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. It's all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing.
Snefjella B; Kuperman V
Cognition; 2016 Nov; 156():135-146. PubMed ID: 27567162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Semantic diversity: a measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words.
Hoffman P; Lambon Ralph MA; Rogers TT
Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):718-30. PubMed ID: 23239067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
Hoffman P; Woollams AM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Concreteness norms for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and word recognition times.
Bonin P; Méot A; Bugaiska A
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Dec; 50(6):2366-2387. PubMed ID: 29435912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating the average need of semantic knowledge from distributional semantic models.
Hollis G
Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1350-1370. PubMed ID: 28707176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A neural signature of phonological access: distinguishing the effects of word frequency from familiarity and length in overt picture naming.
Graves WW; Grabowski TJ; Mehta S; Gordon JK
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 19(4):617-31. PubMed ID: 17381253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.
Brysbaert M; Stevens M; Mandera P; Keuleers E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 26501839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contributions of semantic and contextual diversity to the word frequency effect in L2 lexical access.
Hamrick P; Pandža NB
Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Mar; 74(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 31580087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of semantic transparency and base frequency on the recognition of English complex words.
Xu J; Taft M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):904-10. PubMed ID: 25151246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.
Samson D; Pillon A
Brain Lang; 2004 Nov; 91(2):252-64. PubMed ID: 15485714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How well do word recognition measures correlate? Effects of language context and repeated presentations.
Dirix N; Brysbaert M; Duyck W
Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2800-2816. PubMed ID: 30421181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of semantic diversity in lexical organization.
Jones MN; Johns BT; Recchia G
Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Jun; 66(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 22686160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing.
Rice CA; Tokowicz N; Fraundorf SH; Liburd TL
Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1297-1313. PubMed ID: 31001796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lexical and semantic age-of-acquisition effects on word naming in Spanish.
Davies R; Barbón A; Cuetos F
Mem Cognit; 2013 Feb; 41(2):297-311. PubMed ID: 23180310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.
Li J; Joanisse MF
Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12955. PubMed ID: 33873247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?
Brysbaert M; Cortese MJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 20700859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
