These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11814218)

  • 1. Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability.
    Taft M
    Lang Speech; 2001 Sep; 44(Pt 3):351-76. PubMed ID: 11814218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of syllabic structure in French visual word recognition.
    Rouibah A; Taft M
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Mar; 29(2):373-81. PubMed ID: 11352221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing orthographic structure: associations between print and fingerspelling.
    Emmorey K; Petrich JA
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2012; 17(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 22170294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Syllables and morphemes: contrasting frequency effects in Spanish.
    Alvarez CJ; Carreiras M; Taft M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):545-55. PubMed ID: 11294448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Syllables and bigrams: orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels.
    Conrad M; Carreiras M; Tamm S; Jacobs AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):461-79. PubMed ID: 19331501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthographic vs. phonologic syllables in handwriting production.
    Kandel S; Hérault L; Grosjacques G; Lambert E; Fayol M
    Cognition; 2009 Mar; 110(3):440-4. PubMed ID: 19150536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Syllabic organization and deafness: orthographic structure or letter frequency in reading?
    Olson AC; Nickerson JF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 May; 54(2):421-38. PubMed ID: 11394055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On-line orthographic influences on spoken language in a semantic task.
    Pattamadilok C; Perre L; Dufau S; Ziegler JC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):169-79. PubMed ID: 18476763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Activation of lexical and semantic representations without intention along GPC-sublexical and orthographic-lexical reading pathways in a Stroop paradigm.
    Anton KF; Gould L; Borowsky R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):623-44. PubMed ID: 24294918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ERP correlates of the development of orthographical and phonological processing during Chinese sentence reading.
    Meng X; Jian J; Shu H; Tian X; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1219():91-102. PubMed ID: 18539265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: evidence from ERP analyses.
    Zhao J; Guo J; Zhou F; Shu H
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1761-70. PubMed ID: 21382389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is the difference between OASIS and OPERA? Roughly five pixels: orthographic structure biases the perceived length of letter strings.
    Chetail F; Content A
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):243-9. PubMed ID: 24240087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of syllable structure in aphasic errors: implications for a new model of speech production.
    Romani C; Galluzzi C; Bureca I; Olson A
    Cogn Psychol; 2011 Mar; 62(2):151-92. PubMed ID: 21109241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity to orthographic familiarity in the occipito-temporal region.
    Bruno JL; Zumberge A; Manis FR; Lu ZL; Goldman JG
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1988-2001. PubMed ID: 18180168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does reading performance modulate the impact of orthographic knowledge on speech processing? A comparison of normal readers and dyslexic adults.
    Pattamadilok C; Nelis A; Kolinsky R
    Ann Dyslexia; 2014 Apr; 64(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 24352886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How orthographic transparency affects morphological processing in young readers with and without reading disability.
    Lázaro M; García L; Burani C
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):498-507. PubMed ID: 25899060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental surface dyslexias.
    Friedmann N; Lukov L
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reading for sound with dyslexia: evidence for early orthographic and late phonological integration deficits.
    Savill NJ; Thierry G
    Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1385():192-205. PubMed ID: 21316349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beginning readers activate semantics from sub-word orthography.
    Nation K; Cocksey J
    Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 19108820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there phonologically based priming in the same-different task? Evidence from Japanese-English bilinguals.
    Lupker SJ; Nakayama M; Perea M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1281-99. PubMed ID: 26076173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.