152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11814505)
1. The efficacy of telecolposcopy compared with traditional colposcopy.
Ferris DG; Macfee MS; Miller JA; Litaker MS; Crawley D; Watson D
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):248-54. PubMed ID: 11814505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality and efficacy of a telecolposcopy programme.
Perisic Z; Rasic R; Raznatovic S
J Telemed Telecare; 2005; 11(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 15829039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An online quality assurance program for colposcopy in a population-based cervical screening setting in Italy: results on colposcopic impression.
Cristiani P; Costa S; Schincaglia P; Garutti P; de Bianchi PS; Naldoni C; Sideri M; Bucchi L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2014 Oct; 18(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 24886869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The technical performance and clinical feasibility of telecolposcopy.
Harper DM; Moncur MM; Harper WH; Burke GC; Rasmussen CA; Mumford MC
J Fam Pract; 2000 Jul; 49(7):623-7. PubMed ID: 10923572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical biopsy sampling variability in ALTS.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2011 Apr; 15(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 21169866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colposcopy quality control by remote review of digitized colposcopic images.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):1934-41. PubMed ID: 15592275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial.
Ferris DG; Litaker M;
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 15870519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of colposcopy in HIV seropositive and seronegative women with abnormal Pap tests.
Stewart Massad L; D'Souza G; Darragh TM; Minkoff H; Wright R; Kassaye S; Sanchez-Keeland L; Evans CT
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Dec; 135(3):481-6. PubMed ID: 25127986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Agreement between colposcopic impression and histological diagnosis among human papillomavirus type 16-positive women: a clinical trial using dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy.
Zaal A; Louwers JA; Berkhof J; Kocken M; Ter Harmsel WA; Graziosi GC; Spruijt JW; Balas C; Papagiannakis E; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; van Kemenade FJ; Verheijen RH
BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):537-44. PubMed ID: 22304443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does experience in colposcopy improve identification of high grade abnormalities?
Bekkers RL; van de Nieuwenhof HP; Neesham DE; Hendriks JH; Tan J; Quinn MA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Nov; 141(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 18760872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of cervical histologic results using an abbreviated Reid Colposcopic Index during ALTS.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Mar; 194(3):704-10. PubMed ID: 16522401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strength of correlations between colposcopic impression and biopsy histology.
Massad LS; Collins YC
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jun; 89(3):424-8. PubMed ID: 12798706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Telecolposcopy - a feasibility study in primary care.
Etherington IJ
J Telemed Telecare; 2002; 8 Suppl 2():22-4. PubMed ID: 12217121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of an artificial intelligence system for grading colposcopic impressions and guiding biopsies.
Xue P; Tang C; Li Q; Li Y; Shen Y; Zhao Y; Chen J; Wu J; Li L; Wang W; Li Y; Cui X; Zhang S; Zhang W; Zhang X; Ma K; Zheng Y; Qian T; Ng MTA; Liu Z; Qiao Y; Jiang Y; Zhao F
BMC Med; 2020 Dec; 18(1):406. PubMed ID: 33349257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Remote diagnosis of cervical neoplasia: 2 types of telecolposcopy compared with cervicography.
Ferris DG; Litaker MS; Macfee MS; Miller JA
J Fam Pract; 2003 Apr; 52(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 12681091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Telemedicine network telecolposcopy compared with computer-based telecolposcopy.
Ferris DG; Bishai DM; Litaker MS; Dickman ED; Miller JA; Macfee MS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2004 Apr; 8(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 15874845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Observer agreement on interpreting colposcopic images of CIN.
Hopman EH; Voorhorst FJ; Kenemans P; Meyer CJ; Helmerhorst TJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 58(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 7622107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Colposcopic Impression Based on Live Colposcopy and Evaluation of Static Digital Images.
Liu AH; Gold MA; Schiffman M; Smith KM; Zuna RE; Dunn ST; Gage JC; Walker JL; Wentzensen N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Apr; 20(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 27015261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee.
Homesley HD; Jobson VW; Reish RL
J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6726700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of colposcopic impression based on a single image versus a two-minute time series of colposcopic images.
Perkins R; Jeronimo J; Hammer A; Novetsky A; Guido R; Del Pino M; Louwers J; Marcus J; Resende C; Smith K; Egemen D; Befano B; Smith D; Antani S; de Sanjose S; Schiffman M
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 167(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 36008184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
