These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11816448)

  • 1. The ex-Wald distribution as a descriptive model of response times.
    Schwarz W
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2001 Nov; 33(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 11816448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. QMPE: estimating Lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound.
    Heathcote A; Brown S; Cousineau D
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 May; 36(2):277-90. PubMed ID: 15354694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Studentized bootstrap model-averaged tail area intervals.
    Zeng J; Fletcher D; Dillingham PW; Cornwall CE
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213715. PubMed ID: 30883568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fitting wald and ex-Wald distributions to response time data: an example using functions for the S-PLUS package.
    Heathcote A
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Nov; 36(4):678-94. PubMed ID: 15641415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-Gaussian Distributional Analyses of Reaction Times (RT): Improvements that Increase Efficacy of RT Tasks for Describing Cognitive Processes.
    Osmon DC; Kazakov D; Santos O; Kassel MT
    Neuropsychol Rev; 2018 Sep; 28(3):359-376. PubMed ID: 30178182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Across-task priming revisited: response and task conflicts disentangled using ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.
    Moutsopoulou K; Waszak F
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 22004198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis.
    Matzke D; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):798-817. PubMed ID: 19815782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: methods and packages.
    Cousineau D; Brown S; Heathcote A
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Nov; 36(4):742-56. PubMed ID: 15641420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What response times tell of children's behavior on the balance scale task.
    van der Maas HL; Jansen BR
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2003 Jun; 85(2):141-77. PubMed ID: 12799166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GSDT: An integrative model of visual search.
    Schwarz W; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1654-75. PubMed ID: 27336631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A phase transition model for the speed-accuracy trade-off in response time experiments.
    Dutilh G; Wagenmakers EJ; Visser I; van der Maas HL
    Cogn Sci; 2011 Mar; 35(2):211-50. PubMed ID: 21428999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stroop performance in multiple sclerosis: information processing, selective attention, or executive functioning?
    Macniven JA; Davis C; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E; Constantinescu CS
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Sep; 14(5):805-14. PubMed ID: 18764975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Likelihood-based hypothesis tests for brain activation detection from MRI data disturbed by colored noise: a simulation study.
    den Dekker AJ; Poot DH; Bos R; Sijbers J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Feb; 28(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 19188115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching.
    Van Zandt T; Colonius H; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Jun; 7(2):208-56. PubMed ID: 10909132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speed of information processing in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Kail R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Feb; 20(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 9672823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inferences concerning exponential distributions in the presence of randomly right censored data with missing censored values.
    Singh B
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2002 Mar; 8(1):69-88. PubMed ID: 11878226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions.
    Matzke D; Dolan CV; Logan GD; Brown SD; Wagenmakers EJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1047-73. PubMed ID: 23163766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A framework for ML estimation of parameters of (mixtures of) common reaction time distributions given optional truncation or censoring.
    Dolan CV; van der Maas HL; Molenaar PC
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2002 Aug; 34(3):304-23. PubMed ID: 12395546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extending multinomial processing tree models to measure the relative speed of cognitive processes.
    Heck DW; Erdfelder E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1440-1465. PubMed ID: 27311696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.