These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Programming a long paced atrioventricular interval may be risky in DDDR pacing. Pieterse MG; den Dulk K; van Gelder BM; van Mechelen R; Wellens HJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 7513413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suppression of ventricular output by noise in the atrial channel in a dual chamber pacemaker. Ben-Zur UM; Kahn S; Gross JN; Platt SB; Goodfriend MA; Furman S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Aug; 18(8):1586-8. PubMed ID: 7479181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is accurate rate response programming necessary? Sulke N; Dritsas A; Chambers J; Sowton E Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Aug; 13(8):1031-44. PubMed ID: 1697950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reversion to back-up mode (VOO) in a DDD pacemaker model. Turner M; Zacharkiw L; Marshall AJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Aug; 21(8):1618-20. PubMed ID: 9725162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intermittent P wave sensing in a patient with DDD pacemaker. Paraskevaidis S; Mochlas S; Hadjimiltiadis S; Louridas G Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Apr; 22(4 Pt 1):689-90. PubMed ID: 10234728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of life in patients with complete heart block and paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias: a comparison of permanent DDIR versus DDDR pacing with mode switch to DDIR. Provenier F; Boudrez H; Deharo JC; Djiane P; Jordaens L Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Mar; 22(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 10192855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications of single lead VDD pacing in 35 patients with AV block. Parravicini U; Zanetta M; Zenone F; Bielli M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1901-2. PubMed ID: 1279568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new method of emergency treatment of intermittent pacemaker failure. Crean PA; Reid DS; Gold RG Eur Heart J; 1981 Oct; 2(5):447-9. PubMed ID: 7333302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pacemaker rhythms. Apparent VVI (or ? VOO) pacing by AV sequential demand (DVI) pulse generator. Barold SS; Falkoff MD; Ong LS; Heinle RA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1981 May; 4(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 6169026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term? Ibrahim B; Sanderson JE; Wright B; Palmer R Br Heart J; 1995 Jul; 74(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 7662461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays. Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomized study on the effects of pacemaker programming to a lower output on projected pulse generator longevity. Schuchert A; Meinertz T; Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1234-9. PubMed ID: 11523609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-lead VDD pacing. A case of cross-talk. Simoncelli U; Coppola V; Gentilini C Minerva Cardioangiol; 1997 Sep; 45(9):435-8. PubMed ID: 9436351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]