114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11816939)
21. Understanding Pennsylvania living wills: the 5 Ws.
Pina LL
Pa Nurse; 2009 Dec; 64(4):13-4. PubMed ID: 20166458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Legal aspects of consent 15: living wills and the common law.
Dimond B
Br J Nurs; 2001 Oct 25-Nov 7; 10(19):1256-8. PubMed ID: 11832838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A time to live, a time to die.
Stiefel LS
Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):699-741. PubMed ID: 16144097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The limitations of legislation.
Orentlicher D
MD Law Rev; 1994; 53():1255-305. PubMed ID: 11657533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Conservatorship of Wendland: in the Supreme Court of California.
Bostrom BA
Issues Law Med; 2001; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 11816938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The living will: does an advance refusal of treatment made with capacity always survive any supervening incapacity?
Bernat E
Med Law Int; 1999; 4(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15072072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Position of the American Dietetic Association: legal and ethical issues in feeding permanently unconscious patients.
J Am Diet Assoc; 1995 Feb; 95(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 7852693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Living wills and the right to die.
Wallach SJ; Crabtree JP
Hawaii Med J; 1990 Dec; 49(12):461-4. PubMed ID: 2286520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Council grants MS sufferer right to choke to death.
Templeton SK
Sunday Times; 2004 May; ():A7. PubMed ID: 15457631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. In re Estate of Prange.
Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Fourth Division
North East Rep Second Ser; 1988 Feb; 520():946-54. PubMed ID: 12041256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What would the patient have wanted?
Samuels A
Med Leg J; 2017 Dec; 85(4):182-183. PubMed ID: 29210338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Legal opinion throws status of living wills of patients in vegetative state into doubt.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2016 Nov; 355():i5875. PubMed ID: 27802940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Opinion of the Attorney General No. 88-046.
Maryland. Office of the Attorney General
Opin Atty Gen State Md Md Atty Gen Off; 1988 Oct; 73():1-46. PubMed ID: 12041491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Legal and ethical considerations of "living will".
Huilgol N
Issues Med Ethics; 1996; 4(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 15125415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Barber v. Superior Court of State of California; Nejdl v. Superior Court of State of California.
California. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 2
Wests Calif Report; 1983 Oct; 195():484-94. PubMed ID: 11648259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Advance directives and the personal identity problem.
Buchanan A
Philos Public Aff; 1988; 17(4):277-302. PubMed ID: 11657368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Legal issues concerning the withholding of feeding from patients.
Dimond B
Nurs Times; 2004 May 4-10; 100(18):56-9. PubMed ID: 15151010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Legal issues of physician-assisted euthanasia. Part III--Passive euthanasia, comparison of international legislation, conclusions for medical practice].
Laux J; Röbel A; Parzeller M
Arch Kriminol; 2013; 231(3-4):73-115. PubMed ID: 23678624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
