These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11817090)

  • 1. Criticality of predictors in multiple regression.
    Azen R; Budescu DV; Reiser B
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 Nov; 54(Pt 2):201-25. PubMed ID: 11817090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of a predictor's importance by Random Forests when there is missing data: risk prediction in liver surgery using laboratory data.
    Hapfelmeier A; Hothorn T; Riediger C; Ulm K
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(2):165-83. PubMed ID: 24914728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of survival extrapolation in immuno-oncology using multiple pre-planned data cuts: learnings to aid in model selection.
    Bullement A; Willis A; Amin A; Schlichting M; Hatswell AJ; Bharmal M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):103. PubMed ID: 32375680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using regression models for prediction: shrinkage and regression to the mean.
    Copas JB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1997 Jun; 6(2):167-83. PubMed ID: 9261914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A working guide to boosted regression trees.
    Elith J; Leathwick JR; Hastie T
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Jul; 77(4):802-13. PubMed ID: 18397250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of Two Strategies for Building an Exposure Prediction Model.
    Heiden M; Mathiassen SE; Garza J; Liv P; Wahlström J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jan; 60(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 26424806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of thoracic injury severity in frontal impacts by selected anatomical morphomic variables through model-averaged logistic regression approach.
    Zhang P; Parenteau C; Wang L; Holcombe S; Kohoyda-Inglis C; Sullivan J; Wang S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Nov; 60():172-80. PubMed ID: 24060439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression.
    Azen R; Budescu DV
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Jun; 8(2):129-48. PubMed ID: 12924811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the squared multiple correlation coefficients of non-nested models: an examination of confidence intervals and hypothesis testing.
    Azen R; Sass DA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):163-78. PubMed ID: 17535476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Logistic regression: a brief primer.
    Stoltzfus JC
    Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Oct; 18(10):1099-104. PubMed ID: 21996075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subsampling versus bootstrapping in resampling-based model selection for multivariable regression.
    De Bin R; Janitza S; Sauerbrei W; Boulesteix AL
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):272-80. PubMed ID: 26288150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of intra-individual coefficients of variation on the paired sampling data when inter-individual variations are different between measures.
    Kiyomi F; Nishikawa M; Yoshida Y; Noda K
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Feb; 9():115. PubMed ID: 26896465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guarding against Spurious Discoveries in High Dimensions.
    Fan J; Zhou WX
    J Mach Learn Res; 2016; 17():. PubMed ID: 28936128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
    Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bootstrap model selection had similar performance for selecting authentic and noise variables compared to backward variable elimination: a simulation study.
    Austin PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1009-17.e1. PubMed ID: 18539429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revisiting a statistical shortcoming when fitting the Langmuir model to sorption data.
    Bolster CH
    J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(5):1986-92. PubMed ID: 18689760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Food and Agriculture Sector Criticality Assessment Tool (FASCAT) and the Collected Data.
    Huff AG; Hodges JS; Kennedy SP; Kircher A
    Risk Anal; 2015 Aug; 35(8):1448-67. PubMed ID: 25857323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of modelling options to assess annual variation in susceptibility of generic Escherichia coli isolates to ceftiofur, ampicillin and nalidixic acid from retail chicken meat in Canada.
    MacKinnon MC; Pearl DL; Carson CA; Parmley EJ; McEwen SA
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov; 160():123-135. PubMed ID: 30197208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.