These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11817096)

  • 1. Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 Nov; 54(Pt 2):315-23. PubMed ID: 11817096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of multiple-component measuring instruments: improved evaluation in repeated measure designs.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):119-36. PubMed ID: 17535583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length.
    Feldt LS; Charter RA
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 12741676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method for testing group differences of scale validity in multiple population studies.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):173-84. PubMed ID: 15969845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining group differences in reliability of multiple-component instruments.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2002 May; 55(Pt 1):145-58. PubMed ID: 12034016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Estimation of Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the context of item response theory].
    Shojima K; Toyoda H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2002 Aug; 73(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 12436881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining change in maximal reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments.
    Raykov T; Hancock GR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):65-82. PubMed ID: 15969840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability if deleted, not 'alpha if deleted': evaluation of scale reliability following component deletion.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):201-16. PubMed ID: 17971267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of maximal reliability: a note on a covariance structure modelling approach.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):21-7. PubMed ID: 15171799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proportion of general factor variance in a hierarchical multiple-component measuring instrument: a note on a confidence interval estimation procedure.
    Raykov T; Zinbarg RE
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):193-207. PubMed ID: 21492128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments in test-retest designs.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):285-99. PubMed ID: 16293201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Direct Method for Obtaining Approximate Standard Error and Confidence Interval of Maximal Reliability for Composites With Congeneric Measures.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2006 Mar; 41(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 26788892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Controlling decremental and inflationary effects in reliability estimation resulting from violations of assumptions.
    Becker G
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):403-24. PubMed ID: 11783569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A note on using stratified alpha to estimate the composite reliability of a test composed of interrelated nonhomogeneous items.
    Rae G
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 17563171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement.
    Gwet KL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):29-48. PubMed ID: 18482474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-mode analysis of multimode covariance matrices.
    Kroonenberg PM; Oort FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):305-35. PubMed ID: 14633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proportion of third-level variation in multi-level studies: A note on an interval estimation procedure.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):417-26. PubMed ID: 19793411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Creating comparability among reliability coefficients: the case of Cronbach alpha and Cohen kappa.
    Becker G
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 2):1171-82. PubMed ID: 11272758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Hartmann WM
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 17563170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.