BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11817466)

  • 21. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of composite restorations with Syntac Bond and Denthesive.
    Saunders WP; Muirhead JM
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):255-7. PubMed ID: 1299251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of time and thermocycling on marginal sealing of several dentin adhesive systems.
    Lucena-Martín C; González-Rodríguez MP; Ferrer-Luque CM; Robles-Gijón V; Navajas JM
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(6):550-5. PubMed ID: 11699177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A microleakage study of single-bottle adhesives applied to enamel and cementum and aged by both occlusal loading and thermocycling.
    Ben-Amar A; Pilo R; Shapinko E; Lewinstein I
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Mar; 36(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 15887502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of seven adhesive systems in enamel and dentin.
    Silveira de Araújo C; Incerti da Silva T; Ogliari FA; Meireles SS; Piva E; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):26-33. PubMed ID: 17091137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations.
    Sensi LG; Marson FC; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Junior S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 16299603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Microleakage of amalgam restorations using dentin bonding system primers.
    Berry FA; Parker SD; Rice D; Muñoz CA
    Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):174-8. PubMed ID: 9002794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A single-component bonding system microleakage study.
    Settembrini L; Gultz JP; Scherer W; Kaim J
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 9515439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of a surface sealant on microleakage of Class V restorations.
    May KN; Swift EJ; Wilder AD; Futrell SC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 9002805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures.
    Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL
    Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10649934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cavity disinfectants and dentin bonding.
    Meiers JC; Kresin JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(4):153-9. PubMed ID: 8957905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations.
    Gordan VV; Vargas MA; Cobb DS; Denehy GE
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):244-9. PubMed ID: 9863445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage.
    Opdam NJ; Feilzer AJ; Roeters JJ; Smale I
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of ZOE temporary restorations on microleakage in composite restorations.
    Yap AU; Shah KC; Loh ET; Sim SS; Tan CC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 11933904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Microleakage in primary teeth restored by conventional or bonded amalgam technique.
    Myaki SI; Rodrigues CR; Raggio DP; Flores TA; Matson MR
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11696918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.