These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11817466)

  • 61. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: in vitro comparison of indirect and direct composite.
    Duquia Rde C; Osinaga PW; Demarco FF; de V Habekost L; Conceição EN
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):682-7. PubMed ID: 17153977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Microleakage of etched-dentin composite resin restorations.
    Swift EJ; LeValley BD
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 1410253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Microleakage of a new dental adhesive comparing microfilled and hybrid resin composites.
    Fitchie JG; Puckett AD; Reeves GW; Hembree JH
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Jul; 26(7):505-10. PubMed ID: 8935037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Total bonding vs selective bonding: marginal adaptation of Class 2 composite restorations.
    Thonemann B; Federlin M; Schmalz G; Grundler W
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):261-71. PubMed ID: 10823072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities: effect of microhybrid, flowable, and compactable resins.
    Peris AR; Duarte S; de Andrade MF
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Feb; 34(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 12666857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Effect of bonding agents in the degree of microleakage around posterior composite resin restorations].
    Tzoutzas J; Mountouris G; Vougiouklakis G
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1989 Aug; 43(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 2518058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Short-term evaluation of resin sealing and rebonding on amalgam microleakage: an SEM observation.
    Moosavi H; Sadeghi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Mar; 9(3):32-9. PubMed ID: 18335117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Microleakage of Class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: an in vitro study.
    St Georges AJ; Wilder AD; Perdigão J; Swift EJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 12572642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The effect of internal bevel on marginal leakage at the approximal surface of Class 2 composite restorations.
    Holan G; Eidelman E; Wright GZ
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 9484144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interfacial microleakage.
    Pradelle-Plasse N; Nechad S; Tavernier B; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec; 14(6):344-8. PubMed ID: 11949792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation.
    Ergucu Z; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17333962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Self-etching bonding systems: in-vitro micro-leakage evaluation.
    Brandt PD; de Wet FA; du Preez IC
    SADJ; 2006 Jul; 61(6):248, 250-1. PubMed ID: 16977953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Influence of new light curing units and bonding agents on the microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations.
    Pradelle-Plasse N; Besnault C; Souad N; Colon P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 15002957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Marginal adaptation of resin in relation to application technique and use of a dental adhesive system.
    Kocabalkan E; Dönmez F; Demirköprülü H
    J Marmara Univ Dent Fac; 1994 Sep; 2(1):424-8. PubMed ID: 9582625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The effect of pulse activation on microleakage of a 'packable' composite resin and two 'ormocers'.
    Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M; Kalinderis K; Pedulu L; Papadogiannis Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1068-74. PubMed ID: 15525384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Microleakage of cervical cavities restored with flowable composites.
    Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15241907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around Class V restorations bonded with seven self-etching adhesives.
    Santini A; Ivanovic V; Ibbetson R; Milia E
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(2):128-35; discussion 136. PubMed ID: 15500062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Sealing performance of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose-Z100 in Class II restorations.
    Ferrari M; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1996 Aug; 9(4):145-9. PubMed ID: 9002788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.