These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11817470)

  • 1. Effects of delayed polishing on gap formation of cervical restorations.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 11817470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal seal of resin-modified glass ionomers and compomers: effect of delaying polishing procedure after one-day storage.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):488-96. PubMed ID: 11203861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of delayed polishing periods on interfacial gap formation of Class V restorations.
    Irie M; Tjandrawinata R; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 14531601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal sealing ability of three cervical restorative systems.
    Yap AU; Lim CC; Neo JC
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):817-20. PubMed ID: 8628842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Water storage effect on the marginal seal of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 10823073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Root-surface gap-formation with RMGIC restorations minimized by reduced P/L ratio of the first increment and delayed polishing.
    Irie M; Tjandrawinata R; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):486-97. PubMed ID: 16225915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of cavity design on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.
    Uno S; Finger WJ; Fritz UB
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 9545918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
    Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate versus water-storage performance of Class V flowable composite restoratives.
    Irie M; Hatanaka K; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2006 Sep; 22(9):875-83. PubMed ID: 16837038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage and marginal hybrid layer formation of compomer restorations.
    Prati C; Nucci C; Toledano M; García-Godoy F; Breschi L; Chersoni S
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 14753330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class I gap-formation in highly-viscous glass-ionomer restorations: delayed vs immediate polishing.
    Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 18435195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of spherical silica additions on marginal gaps and compressive strength of experimental glass-ionomer cements.
    Irie M; Nagaoka N; Tamada Y; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Minagi S; Finger WJ
    Am J Dent; 2011 Oct; 24(5):310-4. PubMed ID: 22165460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations.
    Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Oray H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.
    Folwaczny M; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of finishing time on the marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified resin composite.
    Lim CC; Neo J; Yap A
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Jan; 26(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 10080324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Dent Mater; 1998 Jul; 14(4):294-306. PubMed ID: 10379259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Gonzalez Ede H; Yap AU; Hsu SC
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 15470881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.