These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11817470)

  • 21. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Compomers adaptation to Class I and V cavities in permanent teeth.
    el-Kalla IH; García-Godoy F
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(1):29-36, 8. PubMed ID: 10736655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
    Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Class V restorations utilizing a new compomer material: a case presentation.
    Denehy GE; Vargas M
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 Apr; 8(3):269-75; quiz 277. PubMed ID: 9028280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
    Burgess JO; Gallo JR; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal adaptation to enamel of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Dec; 1(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9555215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer-composite Class II restorations.
    Dietschi D; Bindi G; Krejci I; Davidson C
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):500-9. PubMed ID: 12216570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Extent of the cariostatic effect on root dentin provided by fluoride-containing restorative materials.
    Hara AT; Turssi CP; Serra MC; Nogueira MC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):480-7. PubMed ID: 12216567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
    Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in Class V abrasion lesions: two-year results.
    Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 10332375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns.
    Piwowarczyk A; Lauer HC; Sorensen JA
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):445-53. PubMed ID: 15826701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sealing ability of two "compomers" applied with and without phosphoric acid treatment for Class V restorations in vivo.
    Ferrari M; Vichi A; Mannocci F; Davidson CL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 9513096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Temperature mediated coefficient of dimensional change of dental tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Sidhu SK; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 15081549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Effect of water storage and intrapulpal pressure on microleakage of three restorative materials].
    Balogh AE; Bouter D; Fazekas A; Degrange M
    Fogorv Sz; 2000 Sep; 93(9):257-61. PubMed ID: 11057023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An in vitro comparison of marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted permanent molars.
    Wadenya R; Mante FK
    Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 17867395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.