These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11818375)

  • 1. Automated measurement of bulbar redness.
    Fieguth P; Simpson T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 43(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 11818375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of fractal analysis and photometry to estimate the accuracy of bulbar redness grading scales.
    Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Apr; 49(4):1398-406. PubMed ID: 18385056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective grading of the anterior eye.
    Peterson RC; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 19165123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of validated bulbar redness grading scales.
    Schulze MM; Jones DA; Simpson TL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 84(10):976-83. PubMed ID: 18049363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The perceived bulbar redness of clinical grading scales.
    Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 86(11):E1250-8. PubMed ID: 19770812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New clinical grading scales and objective measurement for conjunctival injection.
    Park IK; Chun YS; Kim KG; Yang HK; Hwang JM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Aug; 54(8):5249-57. PubMed ID: 23833063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of an objective method of measuring bulbar redness to the use of traditional grading scales.
    Sorbara L; Simpson T; Duench S; Schulze M; Fonn D
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17254834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia.
    Murphy PJ; Lau JS; Sim MM; Woods RL
    Eye (Lond); 2007 May; 21(5):633-8. PubMed ID: 16518366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Key factors in the subjective and objective assessment of conjunctival erythema.
    Papas EB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Mar; 41(3):687-91. PubMed ID: 10711682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing ocular bulbar redness: a comparison of methods.
    Downie LE; Keller PR; Vingrys AJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Mar; 36(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 26890702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bulbar Redness and Dry Eye Disease: Comparison of a Validated Subjective Grading Scale and an Objective Automated Method.
    Schulze MM; Ng A; Yang M; Panjwani F; Srinivasan S; Jones LW; Senchyna M
    Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Feb; 98(2):113-120. PubMed ID: 33534379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of automated conjunctival hyperemia analysis software.
    Sumi T; Yoneda T; Fukuda K; Hoshikawa Y; Kobayashi M; Yanagi M; Kiuchi Y; Yasumitsu-Lovell K; Fukushima A
    Cornea; 2013 Nov; 32 Suppl 1():S52-9. PubMed ID: 24104935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The measurement of bulbar hyperemia: challenges and pitfalls.
    Baudouin C; Barton K; Cucherat M; Traverso C
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 26069220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical monitoring of ocular physiology using digital image analysis.
    Wolffsohn JS; Purslow C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2003 Mar; 26(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 16303494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hyperemia Analysis Software for Assessment of Conjunctival Hyperemia Severity.
    Yoneda T; Sumi T; Hoshikawa Y; Kobayashi M; Fukushima A
    Curr Eye Res; 2019 Apr; 44(4):376-380. PubMed ID: 30512976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image analyses of the kinetic changes of conjunctival hyperemia in histamine-induced conjunctivitis in Guinea pigs.
    Fukushima A; Tomita T
    Cornea; 2009 Jul; 28(6):694-8. PubMed ID: 19512899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The repeatability of discrete and continuous anterior segment grading scales.
    Chong E; Simpson T; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 May; 77(5):244-51. PubMed ID: 10831214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grading bulbar redness using cross-calibrated clinical grading scales.
    Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(8):5812-7. PubMed ID: 21474775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated grading system for evaluation of ocular redness associated with dry eye.
    Rodriguez JD; Johnston PR; Ousler GW; Smith LM; Abelson MB
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2013; 7():1197-1204. PubMed ID: 23814457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications.
    Efron N; Morgan PB; Katsara SS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Jan; 21(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11220037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.