These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11818597)

  • 1. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease.
    Svensson MH; Svensson E; Lasson A; Hellström M
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 11818597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Saunders BP; Bassett P; Vance M; Bartram CI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):913-21. PubMed ID: 14500202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study.
    van Gelder RE; Birnie E; Florie J; Schutter MP; Bartelsman JF; Snel P; Laméris JS; Bonsel GJ; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):328-37. PubMed ID: 15358854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT colonography versus colonoscopy in the follow-up of patients after diverticulitis - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hjern F; Jonas E; Holmström B; Josephson T; Mellgren A; Johansson C
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Jul; 62(7):645-50. PubMed ID: 17556033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy.
    Florie J; Birnie E; van Gelder RE; Jensch S; Haberkorn B; Bartelsman JF; van der Sluys Veer A; Snel P; van der Hulst VP; Bonsel GJ; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 17885188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective comparison of contrast enhanced CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasms in a single institutional study using second-look colonoscopy with discrepant results.
    Hoppe H; Netzer P; Spreng A; Quattropani C; Mattich J; Dinkel HP
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1924-35. PubMed ID: 15447751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiovascular effects at multi-detector row CT colonography compared with those at conventional endoscopy of the colon.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; O'Donnell C; Morley S; Mistry H; Saunders BP; Vance M; Bassett P; Windsor A; Stern Y; Bethel H; Atkin W; Bartram CI
    Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):782-90. PubMed ID: 14657316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences.
    Gluecker TM; Johnson CD; Harmsen WS; Offord KP; Harris AM; Wilson LA; Ahlquist DA
    Radiology; 2003 May; 227(2):378-84. PubMed ID: 12732696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
    Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current role and future potential of computed tomographic colonography for colorectal polyp detection and colon cancer screening-incidental findings.
    Sohns C; Heuser M; Sossalla S; Wolff H; Obenauer S
    Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 18603183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results.
    Hoppe H; Quattropani C; Spreng A; Mattich J; Netzer P; Dinkel HP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 May; 182(5):1151-8. PubMed ID: 15100110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
    Royster AP; Fenlon HM; Clarke PD; Nunes DP; Ferrucci JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 9353434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.
    Laghi A; Iannaccone R; Carbone I; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Di Giulio E; Schillaci A; Passariello R
    Endoscopy; 2002 Jun; 34(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 12048624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study.
    Spinzi G; Belloni G; Martegani A; Sangiovanni A; Del Favero C; Minoli G
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Feb; 96(2):394-400. PubMed ID: 11232681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incomplete conventional colonoscopy: magnetic resonance colonography in the evaluation of the proximal colon.
    Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Pfeiffer B; Jakobs R; Eickhoff A; Riemann JF; Layer G
    Endoscopy; 2005 Sep; 37(9):816-20. PubMed ID: 16116531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A retrospective evaluation of patient acceptance of computed tomography colonography ("virtual colonoscopy") in comparison with conventional colonoscopy in an average risk screening population.
    Juchems MS; Ehmann J; Brambs HJ; Aschoff AJ
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Nov; 46(7):664-70. PubMed ID: 16372684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy.
    Ajaj W; Lauenstein TC; Pelster G; Holtmann G; Ruehm SG; Debatin JF; Goehde SC
    Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 15591429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue?
    Thomeer M; Bielen D; Vanbeckevoort D; Dymarkowski S; Gevers A; Rutgeerts P; Hiele M; Van Cutsem E; Marchal G
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jun; 12(6):1410-5. PubMed ID: 12042947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Colonoscopy and multidetector-array computed-tomographic colonography: detection rates and feasibility.
    Ginnerup Pedersen B; Christiansen TE; Bjerregaard NC; Ljungmann K; Laurberg S
    Endoscopy; 2003 Sep; 35(9):736-42. PubMed ID: 12929020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Colorectal polyps: detection with dark-lumen MR colonography versus conventional colonoscopy.
    Hartmann D; Bassler B; Schilling D; Adamek HE; Jakobs R; Pfeifer B; Eickhoff A; Zindel C; Riemann JF; Layer G
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 16304088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.