148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11818959)
1. For the record.
Krimsky S
Nat Genet; 2002 Feb; 30(2):139-40. PubMed ID: 11818959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.
Couzin J; Unger K
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):38-43. PubMed ID: 16601164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Scientific misconduct. Even retracted papers endure.
Unger K; Couzin J
Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):40-1. PubMed ID: 16601165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dubious data remain in print two years after misconduct inquiry.
Abbott A; Schwarz J
Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6894):113. PubMed ID: 12110849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Retraction ends furore over cancer vaccine.
Abbott A
Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6953):4. PubMed ID: 12955102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Correcting the scientific record.
Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):381. PubMed ID: 18560424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Commentary: the power of the unrelenting impact factor--is it a force for good or harm?
Smith R
Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Oct; 35(5):1129-30. PubMed ID: 16987843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct. Misconduct by postdocs leads to retraction of papers.
Miller G
Science; 2010 Sep; 329(5999):1583. PubMed ID: 20929816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scientific publishing. Retracted papers spur million-dollar lawsuit.
Travis J
Science; 2005 Oct; 310(5747):425. PubMed ID: 16239453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Retraction notice.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2009 Apr; 108(4):1351. PubMed ID: 19299814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On rejection, resilience, and retraction.
Lanzafame RJ
Photomed Laser Surg; 2013 Jan; 31(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23234336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dealing with charges of scientific misconduct.
Galyean M
J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1035. PubMed ID: 18417753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The science of retraction.
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct. More of Bell Labs physicist's papers retracted.
Service RF
Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5603):31. PubMed ID: 12511624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct. Online sleuths challenge Cell paper.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1669. PubMed ID: 17170263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific misconduct. Falsification charge highlights image-manipulation standards.
Vogel G
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5900):356. PubMed ID: 18927360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Referencing retracted articles.
Emmett M
Am J Med; 2006 Jul; 119(7):e7. PubMed ID: 16828619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Report from the Scientific Integrity Advisor: issues arising in 2005 and 2006.
Daroff RB
Neurology; 2007 May; 68(21):1841-2. PubMed ID: 17515547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
