BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11819017)

  • 1. Failure strength of repair devices versus meniscus suturing techniques.
    Aşík M; Sener N
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Jan; 10(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11819017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Biodegradable meniscus fixations: a comparative biomechanical study].
    Seil R; Rupp S; Jurecka C; Georg T; Kohn D
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Feb; 89(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 12610434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical testing of suture-based meniscal repair devices containing ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene suture: update 2011.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Bava ED; Drew OR
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Jun; 28(6):827-34. PubMed ID: 22317797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A biomechanical comparison of the Mitek RapidLoc, Mitek Meniscal repair system, clearfix screws and vertical PDS and Ti-Cron sutures.
    Naqui SZ; Thiryayi WA; Hopgood P; Ryan WG
    Knee; 2006 Mar; 13(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 16338137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA; Richards DP
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Jan; 20(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 14716278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixation strength of meniscal repair devices.
    Bellemans J; Vandenneucker H; Labey L; Van Audekercke R
    Knee; 2002 Feb; 9(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 11830375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elongation and structural properties of meniscal repair using suture techniques in distraction and shear force scenarios: biomechanical evaluation using a cyclic loading protocol.
    Zantop T; Temmig K; Weimann A; Eggers AK; Raschke MJ; Petersen W
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 May; 34(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 16567460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meniscal repair devices: a clinical and biomechanical literature review.
    Farng E; Sherman O
    Arthroscopy; 2004 Mar; 20(3):273-86. PubMed ID: 15007316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical investigations of different meniscal repair implants in comparison with horizontal sutures on human meniscus.
    Becker R; Schröder M; Stärke C; Urbach D; Nebelung W
    Arthroscopy; 2001 May; 17(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 11337709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strength of different meniscus suturing techniques.
    Aşik M; Sener N; Akpinar S; Durmaz H; Göksan A
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 1997; 5(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 9228313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meniscal repair using the FasT-Fix all-inside meniscal repair device.
    Haas AL; Schepsis AA; Hornstein J; Edgar CM
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Feb; 21(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 15689865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meniscal repair devices.
    Barber FA; Herbert MA
    Arthroscopy; 2000 Sep; 16(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 10976122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cyclic testing of flexible all-inside meniscus suture anchors: biomechanical analysis.
    Zantop T; Eggers AK; Musahl V; Weimann A; Petersen W
    Am J Sports Med; 2005 Mar; 33(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 15716254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pull-out and shear failure strengths of arthroscopic meniscal repair systems.
    Fisher SR; Markel DC; Koman JD; Atkinson TS
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2002 Sep; 10(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 12355304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical test comparing the load to failure of the biodegradable meniscus arrow versus meniscal suture.
    Song EK; Lee KB
    Arthroscopy; 1999 Oct; 15(7):726-32. PubMed ID: 10524820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of lesion location on fixation strength of the meniscal viper repair system: an in vitro study using porcine menisci.
    Chang HC; Caborn DN; Nyland J; Burden R
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 16581451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical testing of a shape memory alloy suture in a meniscal suture model.
    Lamprakis AA; Fortis AP; Kostopoulos V; Vlasis K
    Arthroscopy; 2009 Jun; 25(6):632-8. PubMed ID: 19501294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tensile fixation strengths of absorbable meniscal repair devices as a function of hydrolysis time. An in vitro experimental study.
    Arnoczky SP; Lavagnino M
    Am J Sports Med; 2001; 29(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 11292034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus.
    Kocabey Y; Chang HC; Brand JC; Nawab A; Nyland J; Caborn DN
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Apr; 22(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16581453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The "butterfly" suture technique for meniscal repair.
    Gunes T; Bostan B; Erdem M; Asci M; Sen C; Kelestemur MH
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Mar; 131(3):331-3. PubMed ID: 20617326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.