These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11819017)

  • 21. The influence of suture material on the strength of horizontal mattress suture configuration for meniscus repair.
    Hapa O; Akşahin E; Erduran M; Davul S; Havitçioğlu H; LaPrade RF; Bozdağ E; Sünbüloğlu E
    Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):577-80. PubMed ID: 23340094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Repair of peripheral vertical meniscus lesions in porcine menisci: in vitro biomechanical testing of 3 different meniscus repair devices.
    Lee YH; Nyland J; Burden R; Caborn DN
    Am J Sports Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1074-81. PubMed ID: 23475943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cyclic joint loading can affect the initial stability of meniscal fixation implants.
    Dürselen L; Schneider J; Galler M; Claes LE; Bauer G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Jan; 18(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 12527246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Initial fixation strength of flexible all-inside meniscus suture anchors in comparison to conventional suture technique and rigid anchors: biomechanical evaluation of new meniscus refixation systems.
    Zantop T; Eggers AK; Weimann A; Hassenpflug J; Petersen W
    Am J Sports Med; 2004 Jun; 32(4):863-9. PubMed ID: 15150031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of meniscus compression on the biomechanical properties of repaired meniscal lesions. Winner of the AGA-DonJoy Award 2003.
    Staerke C; Bochwitz C; Groebel KH; Unterhauser F; Becker R
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 May; 124(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 14963723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A cyclic testing comparison of FasT-Fix and RapidLoc devices in human cadaveric meniscus.
    Nyland J; Chang H; Kocabey Y; Nawab A; Brand J; Caborn DN
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 May; 128(5):489-94. PubMed ID: 18094981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cyclic testing of meniscal sutures.
    Seil R; Rupp S; Kohn DM
    Arthroscopy; 2000; 16(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 10882446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures.
    Chang HC; Nyland J; Caborn DN; Burden R
    Am J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 33(12):1846-52. PubMed ID: 16157854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical evaluation of a transtibial pull-out meniscal root repair: challenging the bungee effect.
    Cerminara AJ; LaPrade CM; Smith SD; Ellman MB; Wijdicks CA; LaPrade RF
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 42(12):2988-95. PubMed ID: 25239930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Strategies for repair of radial tears close to the meniscal rim--biomechanical analysis with a cyclic loading protocol.
    Herbort M; Siam S; Lenschow S; Petersen W; Zantop T
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Nov; 38(11):2281-7. PubMed ID: 20889985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Shear force at failure and stiffness of all-inside meniscal repair devices.
    Kesto WK; Esquivel AO; Markel DC
    J Knee Surg; 2013 Dec; 26(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 23729312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Load to failure of common meniscal repair techniques: effects of suture technique and suture material.
    Post WR; Akers SR; Kish V
    Arthroscopy; 1997 Dec; 13(6):731-6. PubMed ID: 9442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Failure strengths of different meniscal suturing techniques.
    Rimmer MG; Nawana NS; Keene GC; Pearcy MJ
    Arthroscopy; 1995 Apr; 11(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 7794425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pull-out strength and stiffness of meniscal repair using absorbable arrows or Ti-Cron vertical and horizontal loop sutures.
    Boenisch UW; Faber KJ; Ciarelli M; Steadman JR; Arnoczky SP
    Am J Sports Med; 1999; 27(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 10496581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bone plug versus suture fixation of the posterior horn in medial meniscalallograft transplantation: a biomechanical study.
    Hunt S; Kaplan K; Ishak C; Kummer FJ; Meislin R
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 18333824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. All-inside meniscal repair devices compared with their matched inside-out vertical mattress suture repair: introducing 10,000 and 100,000 loading cycles.
    Rosso C; Müller S; Buckland DM; Schwenk T; Zimmermann S; de Wild M; Valderrabano V
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Sep; 42(9):2226-33. PubMed ID: 24966304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Failure strengths of suture vs. biodegradable arrow and staple for meniscal repair: an in vitro study.
    Walsh SP; Evans SL; O'Doherty DM; Barlow IW
    Knee; 2001 Jun; 8(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 11337243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tensile and shear loading stability of all-inside meniscal repairs: an in vitro biomechanical evaluation.
    Brucker PU; Favre P; Puskas GJ; von Campe A; Meyer DC; Koch PP
    Am J Sports Med; 2010 Sep; 38(9):1838-44. PubMed ID: 20805413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The "cruciate suture" for arthroscopic meniscal repair: a new technique.
    Abdelkafy A; Wlk M; Krasny C; Landsiedl F
    Arthroscopy; 2006 Oct; 22(10):1134.e1-5. PubMed ID: 17027415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mechanical comparison of meniscal repair devices with mattress suture devices in vitro.
    Aros BC; Pedroza A; Vasileff WK; Litsky AS; Flanigan DC
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2010 Nov; 18(11):1594-8. PubMed ID: 20532866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.