These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11819878)

  • 1. The theory and practice of internal 'tunnel' restorations: a review of the literature and observations on clinical performance over eight years in practice.
    Jones SE
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jul; 6(3):93-100. PubMed ID: 11819878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
    Croll TP
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Restoration of small proximal dentin lesions with the tunnel technique. A 3-year clinical study performed in Public Dental Service clinics.
    Holst A; Brännström M
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):143-8. PubMed ID: 9850556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tunnel restorations placed in routine practice and observed for 24 to 54 months.
    Strand GV; Nordbø H; Leirskar J; von der Fehr FR; Eide GE
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(7):453-60. PubMed ID: 11203966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations.
    Wiegand A; Attin T
    Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 17320944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D; Peric T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
    Foley J; Evans D; Blackwell A
    Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):697-701; discussion 689. PubMed ID: 15592552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7 year follow up study.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 9646387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facial slot Class II restorations: a conservative technique revisited.
    Ewoldsen N
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Jan; 69(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 12556266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study.
    Scholtanus JD; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16973253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of the ART approach and materials in peri-urban farm schools of the Johannesburg area.
    Mickenautsch S; Kopsala J; Rudolph MJ; Ogunbodede EO
    SADJ; 2000 Jul; 55(7):364-8. PubMed ID: 12608196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in the treatment concept for approximal caries from 1983 to 2009 in Norway.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Espelid I
    Caries Res; 2011; 45(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 21412003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restoration of posterior teeth with proximal carious lesions.
    Morand JM; Jonas P
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Jun; 26(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 8602418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.
    Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
    Yassen G
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings.
    da Rosa Rodolpho PA; Cenci MS; Donassollo TA; Loguércio AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):427-35. PubMed ID: 16314023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.