These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11820050)

  • 1. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ
    Quintessence Int; 2001; 32(10):805-10. PubMed ID: 11820050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
    Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The 2-minute impression technique.
    Werrin SR
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Mar; 27(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 9063231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Burgess JO; Mercante D; Hoist S
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Feb; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15732545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.
    Peregrina A; Land MF; Wandling C; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 16126072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical trial to compare double-arch and complete-arch impression techniques in the provision of indirect restorations.
    Lane DA; Randall RC; Lane NS; Wilson NH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 12616233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective clinical evaluation of electronically mixed polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: results from the prosthetic "SuperStudy"--a consumer evaluation.
    Kugel G; Swift EJ; Sorensen JA; Tucker JH; Dunne JT
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1999; (24):S3-21; quiz S22. PubMed ID: 11908410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional analysis of dual-arch impression trays.
    Cayouette MJ; Burgess JO; Jones RE; Yuan CH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 12731600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study.
    Reddy JM; Prashanti E; Kumar GV; Suresh Sajjan MC; Mathew X
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A predictable and accurate technique with elastomeric impression materials.
    Barghi N; Ontiveros JC
    Am J Dent; 1999 Aug; 12(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 10649919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of impressions using hydrophilic polyvinyl siloxane in a clinical study of 249 patients.
    Beier US; Grunert I; Kulmer S; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 17580459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
    Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of preference of mixing techniques and duration of mixing and tray loading for two viscosities of vinyl polysiloxane material.
    Nam J; Raigrodski AJ; Townsend J; Lepe X; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jan; 97(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17280886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Dec; 14(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 16359482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.