These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11820050)

  • 21. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Wastage of a silicone impression material in a general practice setting: a comparison between hand and automixing methods.
    Wilson NH; Cowan AJ; Crisp RJ; Wilson MA
    SADJ; 2001 May; 56(5):233-6. PubMed ID: 11490695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Phillips KM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 12942055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of implant angulation, material selection, and impression technique on impression accuracy: a preliminary laboratory study.
    Rutkunas V; Sveikata K; Savickas R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):512-5. PubMed ID: 22930776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dual-arch and custom tray impression accuracy.
    Davis RD; Schwartz RS
    Am J Dent; 1991 Apr; 4(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 1854447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
    Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dual-arch impressions.
    Bass EV; Kafalias MC
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1567288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Cho GC; Chee WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 15507908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative evaluation of the effects of implant position, impression material, and tray type on implant impression accuracy.
    Gökçen-Rohlig B; Ongül D; Sancakli E; Sermet B
    Implant Dent; 2014 Jun; 23(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 24844388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Application times for the single-step/double-mix technique for impression materials in clinical practice.
    Rupp F; Saker O; Axmann D; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Engel E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(6):562-5. PubMed ID: 22146256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
    Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Full arch impression techniques utilizing addition type poly vinyl siloxane for fabrication of tooth born fixed partial dentures].
    Nissan J; Rosner O; Barnea E; Assif D
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2006 Jan; 23(1):42-6, 71. PubMed ID: 16599333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-way trays: easy to use and abuse.
    Pesun IJ; Swain VL
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec; 74(10):907-11. PubMed ID: 19126360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Practice-based PREP Panel handling evaluation of a new impression mixing device and the associated material.
    Burke FJ; Crisp RJ; Klettke T
    Int Dent J; 2011 Dec; 61(6):321-7. PubMed ID: 22117789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.