These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11820050)
41. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant. Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts. Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Fine detail reproduction of very high viscosity poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials. Chee WW; Donovan TE Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 2700631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays. Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 19418862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Antimicrobial effect of 4 disinfectants on alginate, polyether, and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Al-Jabrah O; Al-Shumailan Y; Al-Rashdan M Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 17580464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The effect of using custom or stock trays on the accuracy of gypsum casts. Rueda LJ; Sy-Muñoz JT; Naylor WP; Goodacre CJ; Swartz ML Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 8957875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Accuracy of the second pour casts using dual-arch trays. Broilo JR; Ghiggi PC; Borges GA; Burnett LH; Spohr AM Stomatologija; 2011; 13(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 21558786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Al-Athel MS J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The impression tray--an important factor in impression precision. Rehberg HJ Int Dent J; 1977 Jun; 27(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 328405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions. O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Clinical acceptance of single-unit crowns and its association with impression and tissue displacement techniques: Findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Lawson NC; Litaker MS; Sowell E; Gordan VV; Mungia R; Ronzo KR; Lam BT; Gilbert GH; McCracken MS; J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):701-709. PubMed ID: 31590974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique. Perakis N; Belser UC; Magne P Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15119881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A clinical evaluation of fixed partial denture impressions. Samet N; Shohat M; Livny A; Weiss EI J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 94(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 16046964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions. Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):299-301. PubMed ID: 18717085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Issues in handling impression materials. Giordano R Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12004656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Indirect inhibition of polymerization of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material: a case report. Chee WW; Donovan TE; Kahn RL Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 2068247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Dual-arch impressions as a diagnostic aid--a case report. Mizrahi B J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Jan; 51(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9461891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]