These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11820181)

  • 1. [Analysis of the convergence relation of reconstructed algorithms disregarding local and global visual evaluations].
    Jank J; Backfrieder W; Bergmann H; Kletter K
    Z Med Phys; 2001; 11(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 11820181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of 3-D maximum a posteriori and filtered backprojection algorithms for high-resolution animal imaging with microPET.
    Chatziioannou A; Qi J; Moore A; Annala A; Nguyen K; Leahy R; Cherry SR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 May; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 11021693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance evaluation of filtered backprojection reconstruction and iterative reconstruction methods for PET images.
    Wang CX; Snyder WE; Bilbro G; Santago P
    Comput Biol Med; 1998 Jan; 28(1):13-24; discussion 24-5. PubMed ID: 9644571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a noise-weighted filtered backprojection algorithm with the Standard MLEM algorithm for poisson noise.
    Zeng GL
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2013 Dec; 41(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 24159012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast EM-like methods for maximum "a posteriori" estimates in emission tomography.
    de Pierro AR; Beleza Yamagishi ME
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Apr; 20(4):280-8. PubMed ID: 11370895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection.
    Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study of lesion contrast recovery for iterative PET image reconstructions versus filtered backprojection using an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom.
    Hsu CH
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2002; 26(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 11818190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maximum-Likelihood Expectation-Maximization Algorithm Versus Windowed Filtered Backprojection Algorithm: A Case Study.
    Zeng GL
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Jun; 46(2):129-132. PubMed ID: 29438005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Convergence study of an accelerated ML-EM algorithm using bigger step size.
    Hwang D; Zeng GL
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):237-52. PubMed ID: 16394336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new iterative reconstruction technique for attenuation correction in high-resolution positron emission tomography.
    Knesaurek K; Machac J; Vallabhajosula S; Buchsbaum MS
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1996 Jun; 23(6):656-61. PubMed ID: 8662099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimisation of the OS-EM algorithm and comparison with FBP for image reconstruction on a dual-head camera: a phantom and a clinical 18F-FDG study.
    Gutman F; Gardin I; Delahaye N; Rakotonirina H; Hitzel A; Manrique A; Le Guludec D; Véra P
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 14579091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Optimization of PET image quality by means of 3D data acquisition and iterative image reconstruction].
    Doll J; Zaers J; Trojan H; Bellemann ME; Adam LE; Haberkorn U; Brix G
    Nuklearmedizin; 1998 Mar; 37(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 9547752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Iterative algebraic reconstruction algorithms for emission computed tomography: a unified framework and its application to positron emission tomography.
    Xu XL; Liow JS; Strother SC
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(6):1675-84. PubMed ID: 8309440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating performance of reconstruction algorithms for 3-D [15O] water PET using subtraction analysis.
    Liow JS; Zhou L
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 May; 19(5):522-31. PubMed ID: 11021695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A non-parametric bootstrap approach for analysing the statistical properties of SPECT and PET images.
    Buvat I
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 May; 47(10):1761-75. PubMed ID: 12069092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative comparison of FBP, EM, and Bayesian reconstruction algorithms for the IndyPET scanner.
    Frese T; Rouze NC; Bouman CA; Sauer K; Hutchins GD
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):258-76. PubMed ID: 12716002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-resolution image reconstruction method for time-of-flight positron emission tomography.
    Yamaya T; Obi T; Yamaguchi M; Ohyama N
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Nov; 45(11):3125-34. PubMed ID: 11098893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The SRT reconstruction algorithm for semiquantification in PET imaging.
    Kastis GA; Gaitanis A; Samartzis AP; Fokas AS
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5970-82. PubMed ID: 26429272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using an external gating signal to estimate noise in PET with an emphasis on tracer avid tumors.
    Schmidtlein CR; Beattie BJ; Bailey DL; Akhurst TJ; Wang W; Gönen M; Kirov AS; Humm JL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(20):6299-326. PubMed ID: 20924132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian image reconstruction for emission tomography based on median root prior.
    Alenius S; Ruotsalainen U
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1997 Mar; 24(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 9143462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.