These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11821839)

  • 1. CGIAR under pressure to support seed treaty.
    Meldolesi A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Feb; 20(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 11821839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic resources. Seed treaty signed; U.S., Japan abstain.
    Charles D
    Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5545):1263-4. PubMed ID: 11701904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Regulatory regimes for transgenic crops.
    Wilson A; Latham J; Steinbrecher R
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul; 23(7):785; author reply 787-9. PubMed ID: 16003352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Opinion: EU biotech regulations stall agricultural improvements in developing countries.
    Biotechnol J; 2007 Jun; 2(6):670. PubMed ID: 17570700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Farmer fined for growing GM seed.
    Spurgeon D
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):615. PubMed ID: 11287907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rethinking substantial equivalence.
    Schenkelaars P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Feb; 20(2):119. PubMed ID: 11821850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Agriculture. Biotech crops good for farmers and environment, Academy finds.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5976):295. PubMed ID: 20395485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maize uncertainties create political fallout.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Feb; 20(2):106-7. PubMed ID: 11821841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CGIAR statement on UN treaty.
    Swaminathan MS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):547. PubMed ID: 12042848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US federal agencies add extra steps for handling GM plants.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):862. PubMed ID: 12205494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US reforms rules for telling public about GM food.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2000 May; 405(6783):108. PubMed ID: 10821240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Plant breeding. Scientists seek easier access to seed banks.
    Finkel E
    Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1376. PubMed ID: 19520929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How important is genetic engineering to European seed firms?
    Arundel A; Hocke M; Tait J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jun; 18(6):578. PubMed ID: 10835548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
    Norrie C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risks of genetically engineered crops.
    Gurian-Sherman D
    Science; 2003 Sep; 301(5641):1845; author reply 1845. PubMed ID: 14512604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. US food-safety body hears protests over genetically modified food.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6762):571. PubMed ID: 10604452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ending event-based regulation of GMO crops.
    Strauss SH; Sax JK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2016 May; 34(5):474-7. PubMed ID: 27153272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. G-8 leaders fudge biotech position.
    Dorey E
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):923-4. PubMed ID: 10973204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Seeds of a perfect storm.
    Fedoroff N
    Science; 2008 Apr; 320(5875):425. PubMed ID: 18436745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.